Multiple Teslas set on fire in Germany
-
This post did not contain any content.
are they not afraid of being labeled terrorists and blackbagged to Guantanamo?
-
are they not afraid of being labeled terrorists and blackbagged to Guantanamo?
No, because they live in a country with rights.
-
No, because they live in a country with rights.
lucky 🥺
-
This post did not contain any content.
FTFY:
political motivescommon sense could not be ruled out. -
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It’s just a Roman bonfire my doods!
-
No, because they live in a country with rights.
They have a right to burn another person's property in Germany? Interesting.
-
Well, one of the board members is his brother and the rest are loyalists so probably not until a shareholder revolt.
Hence the car sales show at the White House, generating some PR to pump up the stock. It worked, for now.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Poor quality lithium batteries.
-
They have a right to burn another person's property in Germany? Interesting.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hell yeah
-
They have a right to burn another person's property in Germany? Interesting.
Corporations are not people outside of the US.
-
Well, one of the board members is his brother and the rest are loyalists so probably not until a shareholder revolt.
Ya, I saw they are all dumping Tesla stock too. LOL.
-
This post did not contain any content.
There should be a contest which region / country / city lights up the most.
-
Corporations are not people outside of the US.
Whether the company still owned the cars (still in a car lot) or if they were already sold, is not relevant. If it's not your property then you don't have a right to burn it.
BTW the article wasn't clear as to who owned the vehicles.
-
This post did not contain any content.
does this count as an attack on America?
-
Whether the company still owned the cars (still in a car lot) or if they were already sold, is not relevant. If it's not your property then you don't have a right to burn it.
BTW the article wasn't clear as to who owned the vehicles.
A property owner has a right not to have their property destroyed, a vandal has a right not to be unreasonably detained. Destruction of property is usually a civil matter and when it isn't it is a criminal matter that doesn't fit the standard definition of terrorism outside really specific circumstances. Both parties deserve to be treated fairly through this process - America has removed that guarantee for the vandal.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Oh dear ! Must be those batteries spontaneously combusting. I remember when that used to happen to Samsung phones a while back.
-
There's a good chance it will be labeled just that. Left extremist terrorism.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Were they really set on fire, or did their batteries just explode? This could very well be another case of the new and improved Pinto spontaneously going off.
