Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. Realities of hosting a tor relay node at home

Realities of hosting a tor relay node at home

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
22 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    Why not on IPv6? If you received a /64 from your ISP and pick only one IPv6 for Tor, I don't see what the issue would be...

    ebby@lemmy.ssba.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    ebby@lemmy.ssba.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
    #21

    Personally, I think IPv6 is not a good choice for any service you don't want associated with a specific device. As I understand it, the prefix delegation comes from the ISP, but often the interface ID is derived from the machine's MAC address which is a link to specific machine hardware, can reveal information about the host, and possibly deanonymoized across networks.

    I'd stick with IPv4 because NAT gives a tad more anonymity. Just my $0.02 though.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ebby@lemmy.ssba.comE [email protected]

      Personally, I think IPv6 is not a good choice for any service you don't want associated with a specific device. As I understand it, the prefix delegation comes from the ISP, but often the interface ID is derived from the machine's MAC address which is a link to specific machine hardware, can reveal information about the host, and possibly deanonymoized across networks.

      I'd stick with IPv4 because NAT gives a tad more anonymity. Just my $0.02 though.

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      I understand your position better, indeed. Thanks for taking the time to explain!
      You'll be happy to learn that what you describe, EUI-64, is not the only way to generate an IPv6 address. The router will give you the prefix in any case, but there is the Stable Privacy Addresses scheme if you want the link-local part generated automatically, and you can set up a static IPv6 address (or several) on your machine, and the router will just have to shut up and deal it to you (for the local part, the prefix is still coming from the ISP)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups