With this huge ranges we'll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
-
With this huge ranges we'll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
-
With this huge ranges we'll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
They can just allocate more IPs. The IPv6 range is barely even used.
Also I imagine that there will be a secondary market for IPv6 at some point.
-
With this huge ranges we'll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
I really doubt it. We could give everyone on Earth their own /48 with less than 1% of the IPv6 address space.
-
I really doubt it. We could give everyone on Earth their own /48 with less than 1% of the IPv6 address space.
The ranges will become larger over time because "we have it", and companies will get thousands of sections with figuratively unlimited IP addresses in them each.
-
They can just allocate more IPs. The IPv6 range is barely even used.
Also I imagine that there will be a secondary market for IPv6 at some point.
The IPv6 range is barely even used.
Yet.
Also I imagine that there will be a secondary market for IPv6 at some point.
Like there already is one for IPv4 addresses?
I stand by my point:
No-one will ever need a /48 range.
