Trump says US and Russia to start talks on Ukraine war ‘immediately’
-
-
Would you object to "treasonous cunt"? (Keep in mind my English sensibilities are that of the UK more than US.)
I mean I wouldn't be surprised if you do.
However "agent" doesn't convey the meaning I wanted. It lacks the emphasis of Putin being the one who asserts the terms.
I'm sorry for enjoying outdated flowery language.
The humorous bit isn't being gay. It's "Trump is a piece of pudding and Putin is an actual ruthless KGB trained wily politician who learned during the Soviets and will manipulate Trump easily".
I apologise for any offense. None was meant. Well, not to wards sexuality minorities. I meant to imply submissiveness, not homophobia. The problem here is also that some of these terms are okay to use within certain communities but you can't know whether I frequent or identify with any of them.
Anyway, 100% my bad, youre right, in sentiment at least if not entirely rhetorically.
I'm genuinely asking out of good faith here ; "agent" seems too clinical and without any negative connotation I wish to attach. I understand my choice of insult was in poor taste, so might I as for alternatives? (If you choose not to high-road me for why we should insult Trump and Putin, that is.)
Gay rights and trans rights are human rights and if anyone wants to take them away I'm gonna identify as a problem. But... I'm also sometimes liberal with language. I'm open-minded to improving mine, but also use mine with condolence and sometimes it results in poor choices. Mea culpa.
-
"Talks". More like "What would You like me to do now Mister Putin, Sir?"
-
My comment was regarding these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Accords
-
to be fair - most of these voters wouldn't even be able to spot Ukraine on a world map even if the name was printed on it in plain english...
-
Thanks for the long explanation! And it's alright.
I'm not trying to police language too much--you'll note that I don't usually remove four-letter words, unless applied to a fellow commenter. Even in cases where the insult can be used in a gendered way, like "cunt."The one you used just hinted at homophobia and I was wondering if there's bigotry behind it. It appears there's not, so that's good.
-
I'm not trying to police language too much
You didn't. Fair criticism.
It appears there's not, so that's good.
I sure like to think so but we're all biased.
-
also the applause aren’t for peace; they’re for not spending money
war is a synonym for expense to the right
-
Do you think the Abraham Accords are undesirable?
-
The PA is a great example of Counter Insurgency
The plight of the Palestinians was an afterthought, if even that. Along with the US, “the Abraham Accords gave Israel the impression they could proceed without anything significant with the Palestinians,” Hellyer said.
And that was a problem, because instead of trying to strike some sort of deal with the Palestinians, the Israelis realized they could push for whatever they wanted with America’s full support. In effect, the Abraham Accords emboldened the Israelis while allowing them to disregard Palestinian demands or rights.
The Abraham Accords emboldened Israel's Settler-Colonial Occupation
-
A fair criticism. However, the situation between Israel and Palestine has been stuck for two decades now.
The Palestinians haven’t even been able to form a unified government for about that time as well.
