Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Protection

Protection

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
51 Posts 36 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E [email protected]

    If it's higher than eye-level, they don't need a cage for it at all. It's not even locked, just use any old Phillips screwdriver to remove the 4 screws!

    C This user is from outside of this forum
    C This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    Why would it be locked????

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • socsa@piefed.socialS [email protected]

      Probably not for a MIMO AP. The whole idea is that you solve the equations to optimize in the presence of multipath. It's legit wizard shit but it's the reason why your cell phone works in a parking garage, because the optimal channel is bouncing off the ventilation shaft. For any reasonably modern AP, it should work the same way. This might hurt a bit but not that much.

      deegeese@sopuli.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
      deegeese@sopuli.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #37

      MIMO will solve lensing issues but not internal reflection or absorbance.

      So like OP says, it’s a signal strength issue.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • marighost@piefed.socialM [email protected]

        I'm just impressed they labelled the WAP.

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #38

        Get a bucket and a mop for that wireless access point

        kolanaki@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • A [email protected]

          Get a bucket and a mop for that wireless access point

          kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #39

          *Wet Access Point.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S [email protected]

            That's just an AP. That's not a directional antenna for a wireless bridge. You can even read the AP sticker on it.

            tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #40

            Yeah, It looks like a Cisco Aironet 2702i WAP.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • H [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #41

              Remember when some jokers started selling Faraday cages for Wi-Fi routers on Amazon, claiming that it would protect the user from wireless signals?

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              17
              • J [email protected]

                The cage is to protect it from flying balls.

                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #42

                Oh, that makes sense. Forgot it was in the gym...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E [email protected]

                  Remember when some jokers started selling Faraday cages for Wi-Fi routers on Amazon, claiming that it would protect the user from wireless signals?

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #43

                  well i mean they're not lying

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  12
                  • j4k3@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

                    This is a 2.4 GHz directional WiFi antenna. Only the back element is connected to the transceiver. All of the other elements are there to focus the signal. Anything metallic within a few feet of an antenna will have a substantial effect on the signal. Think of it as light, because it is, only transparency of materials is a bit weird. The biggest issues will come from metallic materials that are earth grounded and anything with a wire length that is close to the wavelength of the radio light or below, especially around half and a quarter of the wavelength. That pictured wire pitch is spaced very close to the approximate 2.4 GHz wave length. For example most antenna are an insulated trace on a circuit board that is insulated with ground up to a point and then there is a small circuit element that stops the ground and the actual antenna trace continues for the respective light wavelength to transmit or receive. All an antenna is here is an exposed length of single conductor wire.

                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #44

                    Even if this was right, which it isn't, wifi stopped being 2.4Ghz exclusive almost 20 years ago. You have 5Ghz and since 5 year ago or so, 6Ghz, with significantly shorter wavelengths.

                    Z 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Z [email protected]

                      Newer standards are substantially shorter at 5GHz and 6GHz, but this comes at the cost of significantly worse signal penetration through walls.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #45

                      Which in a gym will be will be fine.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T [email protected]

                        Even if this was right, which it isn't, wifi stopped being 2.4Ghz exclusive almost 20 years ago. You have 5Ghz and since 5 year ago or so, 6Ghz, with significantly shorter wavelengths.

                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                        #46

                        And if I look at the frequency spectrum I see that all my neighbours use 2.4GHz (9 are in channel 😎 and I got the entire 5GHz spectrum to myself.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • S [email protected]

                          I think they were trying to say that the cage in front with the AP behind, acts as a directional antenna. Similar to how Yagi antennas have metal elements that aren't connected in front of the actual antenna.

                          But I don't know enough antenna theory to know if that's correct.

                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #47

                          It'll more likely act as a faraday cage.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • Z [email protected]

                            And if I look at the frequency spectrum I see that all my neighbours use 2.4GHz (9 are in channel 😎 and I got the entire 5GHz spectrum to myself.

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #48

                            Channel 8? I thought modern routers automatically select 1 6 and 11. That must be some ancient equipment around.

                            Z 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T [email protected]

                              Channel 8? I thought modern routers automatically select 1 6 and 11. That must be some ancient equipment around.

                              Z This user is from outside of this forum
                              Z This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #49

                              Probably because for most people as long as it works it works and there's no reason to upgrade.

                              T 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Z [email protected]

                                Probably because for most people as long as it works it works and there's no reason to upgrade.

                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #50

                                Sorry, but 9 networks on channel 8 can hardly be described as something "working". I'd bet you barely get a 1mbps on that, and a crazy jitter and packet loss.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A [email protected]

                                  Doesn't look grounded, though.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #51

                                  It is probably more of a reflector rather than blocker, sending the signal back through the wall

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups