Greenland plans to ban foreign political funding over Trump-led election fears
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Both EU and UK should do the same.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And Canada
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Foreign political funding should be banned everywhere by default. It makes no sense to let foreign interests muck about in your domestic policy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Even local political funding should be banned. Elections should be funded by the state with each candidate getting the same amount of exposure.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I’m okay with funding from constituents, with strict caps on amounts. That way people who have lots of public support get more funding, but a wealthy person can’t outspend someone else.
No funding from corporations, and no anonymous funding.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's already the law in Canada:
Only individuals who are Canadian citizens or permanent residents can make contributions to registered parties, electoral district associations, candidates, leadership contestants and nomination contestants.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That sounds like a system that would be rife for abuse.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Beautiful
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We already have too many narcissistic leaders everywhere because they can be superficially charming and build up loads of useful connections. It makes sense to have a cut-off for who gets funding at all, but they should all get the same amount of exposure.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Andrew Yang has a great term for this:
Also his term for UBI:
Great naming lol. Like who could hate something called "Freedom Dividend" and "Democracy Dollars" (Magats would hate it, they hate democracy)
Other Policies, if you're interested: https://2020.yang2020.com/policies/?tab=all
If ranked choice was a thing, I'd probably rank Yang #1, Bernie #2. (Since Yang would probabky never get elected, so I might as well give him the #1 ranking, his ideas are cool)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, good thing no one can abuse the current system by having a lot of money.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Depends on which current system you mean. I'm Canadian, and while it's not perfect, it's a pretty good system.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don’t think tanks, missiles and boots on the ground cares too much about elections! Trump is a facist and he’ll use the American empire military and economic force to bend other nations to his will!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If he decides to go to war on multiple fronts with no one backing him up, I don't think it will go well for him.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
At least Germany already does it. On the federal level the maximum donation for non-EU citizens/corporations is 1000 Euro, which is why the Bundestag is investigating Musk giving Weidel a platform as if you were to buy that kind of reach you'd pay way more than 1k. It's generally the parties which get fined for accepting. Donations over 10k must be publicised, over I think 35k immediately. State law is generally similar.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is the best preventative measure they can do for now. Musk and other actors can dump massive amounts of money into elections to sway them and many of these democracies haven’t been challenged from outside like this before.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How? You get a certain amount of funds to be spent on specific regulated activities if you pass a threshold of signatures.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I used to be interested in the things Andrew Yang had to say back in 2020, especially with regard to UBI, but I'm really put off by him now. His whole schtick is a libertarian technocratic utopian fantasy. The expansion of welfare while simultaneously sucking up to oligarchs is just a way to preserve the capitalist status quo. He wants to breathe new life into the machine that's exploiting us and destroying the planet.
His vision for the future is basically just the UN as depicted in The Expanse.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lol yea, dude is a capitalist, but I mean like... I still like him better than like... Joe Biden 🤮
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There's always russia and Isreal.