Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. Has anyone gotten up and running with activitypods yet?

Has anyone gotten up and running with activitypods yet?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Activity Pods is supposed to allow you to have one account across the fediverse and it's still in early dev. I do see that they have some docker images, but there's no descriptions on what they're for and their instructions involve running make scripts to get running.

    I can do that inside of a docker container, but running TrueNas I'm limited to running those, which is fine, I can do that, but the other thing that seems a bit confusing is that it looks like they want you to define "shapes" for different services to communicate with.

    It might just look more complicated than it is. Has anyone successfully gotten up and running with it?

    J hadowenkiroast@lemmy.dbzer0.comH 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • System shared this topic on
    • R [email protected]

      Activity Pods is supposed to allow you to have one account across the fediverse and it's still in early dev. I do see that they have some docker images, but there's no descriptions on what they're for and their instructions involve running make scripts to get running.

      I can do that inside of a docker container, but running TrueNas I'm limited to running those, which is fine, I can do that, but the other thing that seems a bit confusing is that it looks like they want you to define "shapes" for different services to communicate with.

      It might just look more complicated than it is. Has anyone successfully gotten up and running with it?

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Doesn't look like anything integrates with it yet except for something called Mastopod.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J [email protected]

        Doesn't look like anything integrates with it yet except for something called Mastopod.

        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        oh, I thought that was a mastodon thing or something. Thank you for the clarification 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R [email protected]

          Activity Pods is supposed to allow you to have one account across the fediverse and it's still in early dev. I do see that they have some docker images, but there's no descriptions on what they're for and their instructions involve running make scripts to get running.

          I can do that inside of a docker container, but running TrueNas I'm limited to running those, which is fine, I can do that, but the other thing that seems a bit confusing is that it looks like they want you to define "shapes" for different services to communicate with.

          It might just look more complicated than it is. Has anyone successfully gotten up and running with it?

          hadowenkiroast@lemmy.dbzer0.comH This user is from outside of this forum
          hadowenkiroast@lemmy.dbzer0.comH This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          it is a nice concept but to me it sounds like centralized defederated media.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • System shared this topic on
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups