OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In French?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Before reading any articles concerning Deep Seek's origin, it took me awhile to realise that they probably stole the data and technology from Western AI developers. Developing a better AI and as open source that quickly is pretty much impossible. And everyone knows that CCP steal IP and technology from the West so it's unsurprising.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh cry me a river, DeepSeek is OpenSource, OpenAI (Which should be renamed to ClosedAI) isn't
DeepSeeknis the more ethical AI toolkit
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
so because openAI stole their corpus of training info first, they get to call others thieves?
lol...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's still stealing regardless of who called dibs first.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thanks I was looking for the world's smallest violin
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't believe any of these assholes about anything tbh.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't disagree at all. I think there's going to be a reckoning when one of these companies finally makes a product that earns a profit.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
"It's only okay if western companies steal." duh!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Open weight*
Anything needed to actually train the model is as closed as ClosedAI is.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
See, so when they steal from US, itβs fine. But when someone steals from THEM, suddenly we have a problem