OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
Corporations are allowed to steal, just not from each other, that's bad. /s
-
Says the company that literally crawled the Internet without anyone’s permission to train their damn model.
Rules for thee, not for me.
-
Tragic really
-
of the wealthy, by the wealthy, for the wealthy
-
Open AI used OUR work with out permission
-
Well well, how the turn tables.
-
"And there’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled the knowledge out of OpenAI models, and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this," Sacks explained.
What makes this even funnier is that A.I generated content isn't even copyrightable.
-
-
-
Oh, gee, a good news for today!
-
Someone I saw on YouTube asked, "How can you steal from someone named 'OpenAI'?"
-
From my experience and expertise, Ambien. Man's gonna get a knock on the door from the walrus any second now.
-
it's ok ChatGPT you can join us the unemployed
-
It's true! Ai will take our jobs! Hahahaha
-
There exists not, a violin small enough for this occasion.
-
Meanwhile OpenAI no doubt frantically copying the shit out of Deepseek right now
-
Do you want to go back to where I found you!? Unemployed!? In Greenland?!
-
The user is asking for me to rephrase a difficult to parse line of text.
I think the poster was talking about my code being open source and free and therefore my coders and country not being interested in generating profit.
But wait, perhaps the user was just having a stroke. Perhaps this posting was a cry for help and the icey cold world of Lemmy just down-voted the user instead of coming to his aide
But wait, that's unlikely. The user was probably drunk and just has fat fingers likely covered in powdered cheese which can cause data entry errors on touch screen devices.
I should also consider that the user is a non-English speaker and ran their comment through a translator application that butchered their intent. But wait, the punctuation does not look like something a translation app would generate without poor data input.
I think ultimately I should be careful not to offend anyone, but the most likely explanation is that this was someone with limited experience with written English and some degree of intoxication. The meaning is vague and the comment is best left ignored. -
Copying protected work without consent has been their MO so nothing changed.
-
The local versions I've tested out today are absolutely garbage. It frustrated me over simple questions.
