OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
it's ok ChatGPT you can join us the unemployed
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's true! Ai will take our jobs! Hahahaha
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There exists not, a violin small enough for this occasion.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Meanwhile OpenAI no doubt frantically copying the shit out of Deepseek right now
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do you want to go back to where I found you!? Unemployed!? In Greenland?!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The user is asking for me to rephrase a difficult to parse line of text.
I think the poster was talking about my code being open source and free and therefore my coders and country not being interested in generating profit.
But wait, perhaps the user was just having a stroke. Perhaps this posting was a cry for help and the icey cold world of Lemmy just down-voted the user instead of coming to his aide
But wait, that's unlikely. The user was probably drunk and just has fat fingers likely covered in powdered cheese which can cause data entry errors on touch screen devices.
I should also consider that the user is a non-English speaker and ran their comment through a translator application that butchered their intent. But wait, the punctuation does not look like something a translation app would generate without poor data input.
I think ultimately I should be careful not to offend anyone, but the most likely explanation is that this was someone with limited experience with written English and some degree of intoxication. The meaning is vague and the comment is best left ignored. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Copying protected work without consent has been their MO so nothing changed.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The local versions I've tested out today are absolutely garbage. It frustrated me over simple questions.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You're laughing? OpenAI's hard work is being stolen, and you're laughing?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why is that? I mean why does the locally run version suck?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sounds like it's fair game because they improved on it. A lot. And this is only the version they threw back over the fence.
-
I think you mean “peons”?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I know it's not DeepSeek, but this is what I got out of the Reasoner V1 model in GPT4All ("Based on Qwen2.5-Coder 7B"). Use local models with care!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Only if you are the original owner, otherwise it is obviously still stolen.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Awwwww diddums. Do you not like it when people steal your work to make money from it? That must be so difficult for you...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Hahahahahaha
Hhaahahaha
Hahahaha hahaha
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nahh pedon but similar meaning
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I mean, open is in their name. They shouldn't have dressed like that. They were asking for it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
this is the response I came for