OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission

[apfelwoischoppen@lemmy.world]

Copying protected work without consent has been their MO so nothing changed.

[rascalnikov@literature.cafe]

The local versions I've tested out today are absolutely garbage. It frustrated me over simple questions.

[theimpressivex@lemm.ee]

You're laughing? OpenAI's hard work is being stolen, and you're laughing?

[saharamaleikuhm@feddit.org]

Why is that? I mean why does the locally run version suck?

[kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

[techanon@lemm.ee]

Sounds like it's fair game because they improved on it. A lot. And this is only the version they threw back over the fence.

[felixwhynot@lemmy.world]

I think you mean “peons”?

[datendefekt@feddit.org]

I know it's not DeepSeek, but this is what I got out of the Reasoner V1 model in GPT4All ("Based on Qwen2.5-Coder 7B"). Use local models with care!

[excessshiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Only if you are the original owner, otherwise it is obviously still stolen.

[activ8r@sh.itjust.works]

Awwwww diddums. Do you not like it when people steal your work to make money from it? That must be so difficult for you...

[benni@lemmy.world]

Hahahahahaha

Hhaahahaha

Hahahaha hahaha

[oyo@lemm.ee]

I mean, open is in their name. They shouldn't have dressed like that. They were asking for it.

[lipilee@feddit.nl]

this is the response I came for

[anomnom@sh.itjust.works]

Pedons is French/shorthand for pedestrians

[anomnom@sh.itjust.works]

We’re in sub-atomic volon sympathy territory now.

[michal@programming.dev]

So? They can just steal it back ‍️

[anomnom@sh.itjust.works]

Deepseek is open source. So OpenAI would be closer to their namesake if they started using deepseeks model.

[anomnom@sh.itjust.works]

Careful, humans do stupid and dangerous shit when they’re cold and desperate.

[anomnom@sh.itjust.works]

Such convincing gaslighting. I’m too lazy to look, but was Gomer Pyle a cameo/guest on that episode of the simpsons? or is it just total hallucination?

[zeoic@lemmy.world]