OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
The local versions I've tested out today are absolutely garbage. It frustrated me over simple questions.
-
You're laughing? OpenAI's hard work is being stolen, and you're laughing?
-
Why is that? I mean why does the locally run version suck?
-
-
Sounds like it's fair game because they improved on it. A lot. And this is only the version they threw back over the fence.
-
I think you mean “peons”?
-
I know it's not DeepSeek, but this is what I got out of the Reasoner V1 model in GPT4All ("Based on Qwen2.5-Coder 7B"). Use local models with care!
-
Only if you are the original owner, otherwise it is obviously still stolen.
-
Awwwww diddums. Do you not like it when people steal your work to make money from it? That must be so difficult for you...
-
Hahahahahaha
Hhaahahaha
Hahahaha hahaha
-
Nahh pedon but similar meaning
-
I mean, open is in their name. They shouldn't have dressed like that. They were asking for it.
-
this is the response I came for
-
Pedons is French/shorthand for pedestrians
-
We’re in sub-atomic volon sympathy territory now.
-
So? They can just steal it back
️ -
Deepseek is open source. So OpenAI would be closer to their namesake if they started using deepseeks model.
-
Careful, humans do stupid and dangerous shit when they’re cold and desperate.
-
Such convincing gaslighting. I’m too lazy to look, but was Gomer Pyle a cameo/guest on that episode of the simpsons? or is it just total hallucination?
-
