OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
Because it has fewer parameters and (in some cases) it's quantized. The hardware needed to run local inference on the full model is not really feasible to most people. Though, the release of it will probably still make a wide impact on the quality of other upcoming smaller models being distilled from it, or trained on synthetic data from it, or merged with it, etc.
-
-
Deepseek made the code open source. This is not what they want. They want proprietary code and want to earn more money.
-
This is a "not the onion" level headline, holy shit
-
What is a pedon? The dictionary says it's a soil sample.
-
-
Yeah no doubt... People call me a pleb but I am a pedon
-
Felony contempt of business model
-
There's a name for that. It's called "karma".
-
Don't let ANYBODY ever call you a pleb, I know and you know that in your heart you are a pedon.
Raises mud clump in solidarity
-
The bots stole our jobs, then the other bots stole the jobs from the first bots.
Cry me a river.
-
Oh noooo!
Anyway.
-
Made by Deepseek
-
In French?
-
Before reading any articles concerning Deep Seek's origin, it took me awhile to realise that they probably stole the data and technology from Western AI developers. Developing a better AI and as open source that quickly is pretty much impossible. And everyone knows that CCP steal IP and technology from the West so it's unsurprising.
-
Oh cry me a river, DeepSeek is OpenSource, OpenAI (Which should be renamed to ClosedAI) isn't
DeepSeeknis the more ethical AI toolkit
-
so because openAI stole their corpus of training info first, they get to call others thieves?
lol...
-
It's still stealing regardless of who called dibs first.
-
Thanks I was looking for the world's smallest violin
-
I don't believe any of these assholes about anything tbh.
