AI Training Slop
-
This post did not contain any content.
the cool thing about consent is that you're allowed to attack everyone who pretends it isn't real with any amount of force
-
Yup. Last year some Harvard students put together a demo where they used Meta's smart glasses and commercial apps to scan people's faces, find their social media profiles, and summarize info about them, like where they live, work, their phone numbers, and names of their relatives in real time.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]So basically Watch_Dogs profilers IRL
-
Like private subreddits or private messages.
Ah when stuff is behind a password but not encrypted and still on their servers. Yes.
-
It's already done, if you have any photographs of yourself on the internet. No need to fight that battle, accept and push forward.
And what if there's no photograph of myself online?
-
This post did not contain any content.
wow that's evil
-
the cool thing about consent is that you're allowed to attack everyone who pretends it isn't real with any amount of force
i mean, I would allow you, but the law doesn't unfortunately
-
And what if there's no photograph of myself online?
Be happy
-
wow that's evil
It's cleverly addressing a valid point. If your face is visible on the internet it can be used in an ai database without your consent. That's just where we're at.
-
Like private subreddits or private messages.
Reddit is about to make that somewhat more "public", I heard they are changing the pm and DMs to a chat system
-
It's cleverly addressing a valid point. If your face is visible on the internet it can be used in an ai database without your consent. That's just where we're at.
yeah fair enough but every use of the studio Ghibli image generator is one too many
-
And what if there's no photograph of myself online?
Pics or it didn't happen.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yes I have.
With a model I fine tuned myself and ran locally on my own hardware.
Suck it
-
Yes I have.
With a model I fine tuned myself and ran locally on my own hardware.
Suck it
Just curious, do you know even as a rough estimation (maybe via the model card) how much energy was used to train the initial model and if so how do you believe it was done so in an ecologically justifiable way?
-
Your "facial data" isn't private information. You give it away every time you go outside.
Your face being outside isn't your "facial data". It has to at least have that image, sure, in good enough quality, easy enough, linked to any piece of your identity, e.g. name or security number. If you just walk around and people take photo of your face, they don't have your "facial data". That's the entire reason why reverse image search and similar services exist. It is NOT an easy problem technically speaking.
-
Just curious, do you know even as a rough estimation (maybe via the model card) how much energy was used to train the initial model and if so how do you believe it was done so in an ecologically justifiable way?
Don’t know. Don’t really care honestly. I dont pay for hydro, and whatever energy expenditures were involved in training the model I fine tuned is more than offset by the fact that I don’t and never will drive.
-
Pics or it didn't happen.
-
Like private subreddits or private messages.
If it's on a billionaire's computer, and they can read it, then yes. They'll sell it, no questions asked.
E2E encrypted data is probably OK, as long as that person didn't save it somewhere and upload it to a cloud backup.
-
Just curious, do you know even as a rough estimation (maybe via the model card) how much energy was used to train the initial model and if so how do you believe it was done so in an ecologically justifiable way?
Just curious. Do you know how many children had a hand in making your electronics?
-
Don’t know. Don’t really care honestly. I dont pay for hydro, and whatever energy expenditures were involved in training the model I fine tuned is more than offset by the fact that I don’t and never will drive.
Don’t know. Don’t really care honestly [...] offset by the fact that I don’t and never will drive.
That's some strange logic. Either you do know and you can estimate that the offset will indeed "balance it out" or you don't then you can't say one way or the other.
-
Just curious, do you know even as a rough estimation (maybe via the model card) how much energy was used to train the initial model and if so how do you believe it was done so in an ecologically justifiable way?
Feel free to explain the down votes.
If it wasn't clear the my point was that self hosting addresses mostly privacy for the user but that is only one dimension addressed. It does not necessarily address the ecological impact. I was honestly hoping this community to care more.
