Democrat teams up with movie industry to propose website-blocking law
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Article 1) Streaming prices going up
Article 2) websites being blocked -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Democrats: "Please for the love of God, don't vote for us ever again! We really, really don't want to win."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
invest in VPN providers
I'm guessing lofgren has already done that
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They're absolutely is, it's called onion routing, get around DNS blocks with tor as long as you know where you're going.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is some dumb shit.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The country is being burned to the ground from the inside by fascists, and this is the hill Democrat politicians choose to die on?!! Holy shit! What a fucking joke!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I use a self hosted pihole for DNS. It needs an upstream DNS server for resolving unchached dns's. I have pihole point to quad9 then cloudflair then google then I have it point to a bunch of unfiltered DNS servers across the world.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It sort if have to be. In the end there has to be one source of truth for each TLD, otherwise who is to say who owns foo.com, and what it resolves to?
And then the same structure for assigning TLD ownership.
But there is nothing stopping you from running another DNS service, call it DNS2 with different root servers, etc. It is just going to be extemely hard to convince people to use it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We already have site blocking in France.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn't really associated with streaming or producing movies.
My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If they are not blocking the access to the WHO.is servers you can get the IP address of the site and add it to your local hosts file.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm missing the part where consumers are required to use their ISP DNS. I never do, in favour of CloudFlare DNS, Google DNS, etc
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Pihole also let's you install unbound. Your own recursive resolver. So you don't have to rely on google or quad9 etc.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Cool I might do that. I assume I can find a docker compose somewhere.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ginat meteor is what we need.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Trump is president and this is their priority?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Corporate dictatorship masquerading as "democracy"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Wait until they start "the VPN wars". it's invariable at this point. Only the VPN that has bribed The Emperor the most will survive.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Democrats once again losing on purpose.