Democrat teams up with movie industry to propose website-blocking law
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Cause people fail to awknowledge there is more to politics than just left and right, or progressive and conservative, etc.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Friday, April 13, 2029
Can't help but wonder if it's bad luck if it hits us, or bad luck if it misses us at this point.
(/s shit's fucked but I still prefer getting missed)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
*inevitable
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why would you not quote the first paragraph that explains everything about the law?
US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed a law that would let copyright owners obtain court orders requiring Internet service providers to block access to foreign piracy websites. The bill would also force DNS providers to block sites.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
TBH they can't really pass anything even if they wanted to focus on more important issues. Majority Leaders call votes and they're both Republicans.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
When you forgot to educate your people well enough so you don't have to worry about what they see.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't think it's even corporate now. There is oligopolies/monopolies in each sector already
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sometimes I feel like democrats don't actually care more about voters, they just care much more about appearances.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Just a step in the direction towards that, though. They'll pass it, and people will still pirate. Then, they'll claim the legislation wasn't enough and pass another bill further encroaching on our freedom on the internet.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Maybe, but for now she doesn't have a single co-sponsor. LINK TO THE BILL
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And rich people
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
yeah today's been a day
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Idk man, that sounds like evidence based thinking, to me, reported.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The fact that this dumb bitch is trying to do this, a blatant violation of open internet ideas btw, as the technocracy makes its opening moves is the real problem.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Don't settle for half measures.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm not sure where the fuck you've been hiding but Net Neutrality got struck down when we voted Fascists into power, so maybe cool it with blaming the dems for that one, pal.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
its uh, definitely one of the feelings of all time reading through threads like this, assuming these are actual real people, spending their actually real time, talking about these actually real things.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
From California? Hmmm... Why would a representative from California put forward such a bill?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm only blaming the Dems that support and author it.