Anon breaks up
-
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary”
-Karl Marx
I have no weapon but nonviolence.
- Mahatma Gandhi
See, I can quote things too
-
This is so American. Just give up the damn guns!
Make me.
Oh wait. You can't
-
and leave the violent fascists in red states and the government to have a monopoly on violence? get fucked.
So you think your 9mm is going to defend you from a government tank when it actually comes down to violence? You're fucked, gun or no gun.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wtf? Cops just come and take your shit away because some girl said so?
-
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary”
-Karl Marx
Gun people are suddely literate when someone agrees with them.
-
I have no weapon but nonviolence.
- Mahatma Gandhi
See, I can quote things too
You say people should just give up their weapons. I used to be strictly against private weapon ownership too. Over the years, especially the last few years i see more and more of a necessity for people to be able to fight back against an overreaching government, as we have seen more and more authoritarian developments all across the "Western" nations.
This is what Marx referred to.
There is a political case for private weapon ownership. The obvious counter-argument is that people like MAGA also have weapons then and can use them. As we have seen with previous and current dictatorships, when push comes to shove the regime will quickly supply its paramilitary wings with guns, so i don't see the benefit of preventing normal people from owning weapons in such a situation.
None of this is a judgement on the green-text, as we lack the whole picture, on whether taking the weapons from anon was justified or not. However the default assertion that people should just give up their weapons is not as obvious as you make it out to be.
-
So you think your 9mm is going to defend you from a government tank when it actually comes down to violence? You're fucked, gun or no gun.
The concept of an armed populace facing the government doesn’t usually involve a direct head on opposition. Armed resistance to a corrupt government would take a more guerrilla warfare approach. A real world example could be the anti-junta rebellion happening in Myanmar.
-
I have no weapon but nonviolence.
- Mahatma Gandhi
See, I can quote things too
Gandhi was a piece of shit. I wouldn't quote him for the most part.
-
Wtf? Cops just come and take your shit away because some girl said so?
No. Thats 4chan, a place of lies and deception.
-
Make me.
Oh wait. You can't
Gets tomahawked
-
No. Thats 4chan, a place of lies and deception.
When I was living with my parents my dad pushed my brother and told him to "get the fuck out". My brother called the cops on him and the cops came and took my dad away that day. He got let out but IIRC a couple days later he had to surrender his firearms later until everything was settled.
-
So you think your 9mm is going to defend you from a government tank when it actually comes down to violence? You're fucked, gun or no gun.
I'm not worried about the tank, I'm worried about Tim, the guy from two doors down who has seventeen firearms and an F350 and walks around yelling homophobic slurs.
-
You say people should just give up their weapons. I used to be strictly against private weapon ownership too. Over the years, especially the last few years i see more and more of a necessity for people to be able to fight back against an overreaching government, as we have seen more and more authoritarian developments all across the "Western" nations.
This is what Marx referred to.
There is a political case for private weapon ownership. The obvious counter-argument is that people like MAGA also have weapons then and can use them. As we have seen with previous and current dictatorships, when push comes to shove the regime will quickly supply its paramilitary wings with guns, so i don't see the benefit of preventing normal people from owning weapons in such a situation.
None of this is a judgement on the green-text, as we lack the whole picture, on whether taking the weapons from anon was justified or not. However the default assertion that people should just give up their weapons is not as obvious as you make it out to be.
Gun ownership isn't the problem. Gun culture is the problem.
I've been the victim of more than one violent crime but it's only been recently that I'm considering acquiring a firearm. For the exact reasons you're describing.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I'd like to hear her version
-
This is so American. Just give up the damn guns!
wrote last edited by [email protected]Because we should totally trust the US government with our protection....
-
No. Thats 4chan, a place of lies and deception.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_flag_law
Despite being blatantly unconstitutional (deprives a citizen of rights based on an accusation without trial) red flag laws exist in 21 states.
In this particular thread, 4chan is a better source of information than Lemmy.
-
This post did not contain any content.
"She's probably right." "Dude was probably violent." "Easier to give up your guns than fight this in court" "Just give up your guns!"
Lmao wowww lemmy. Nobody here likes due process?
-
Give up hate. Give up facism. Give up excessive consumerism
All sounds fine to me!
Gun ownership =/= fascism
-
So you think your 9mm is going to defend you from a government tank when it actually comes down to violence? You're fucked, gun or no gun.
You're forgetting that the US lost 3 wars to guerilla tactics, 2 of those in the last decade
-
I'm not worried about the tank, I'm worried about Tim, the guy from two doors down who has seventeen firearms and an F350 and walks around yelling homophobic slurs.
Tim shouldn't be allowed guns either.
