Is there a path forward for better support of newer hardware on desktop Linux?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, I was going to leave it for the joke, but changed it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't have a solution just another experience: i have a Acer Xb270hu that i never got to work 100% . without edid tweaks it would only show a tiny picture and with the tweaks it only ever got to 120 hz. Now i have a Alienware AW2725DF and it works at 360hz out if the box no issues
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Could the kernel makers create some sort of sandbox to run Windows drivers in - so we ride on Windows coat tails until true Linux drivers are available?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, especially for new AMD hardware a rolling release distribution is must have. My personal recommendation is openSUSE but the specific pick is secondary.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bring back the good old days of ndiswrapper.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do motherboard/monitor/IC/etc manufactures need to submit their own kernel patches well in advance of product releases, like what AMD and Intel do for their CPUs and GPUs? Are we just waiting for them to give a shit?
Yes. There isn't really any other good solution.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I am really surprised how up to date Fedora is. The frequency is rather surprising. I have Arch on a desktop and Fedora on a laptop and the default kernel is only a step behind. Gimp was set as 3 for months now on Fedora which also was a surprise.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'd argue that would make even less of an incentive for manufacturers to make Linux drivers.
We are already kind of seeing that in the gaming space. Why bother making a native Linux port if it works fine enough on Proton/Wine. We effectively end up with Win32/Linux
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I've run fedora for over two years and it was fantastic. I just didn't like how it shifted to flatpaks. I'm not a big fan of flatpaks, so I left for Endeavour OS and never looked back.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I am using both in arch and fedora, depends on what I am trying to do. But I don't think I have ran into having to use flatpacks in fedora. But I am sure there must be some packages they no longer maintain.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I wasn't around that early, was ndiswrapper, bad?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Doing it ourselves might have the same effect though - "oh well, they have their own driver they are happy with"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
May I ask which motherboard was it ? I am planning to get soon exactly the same specs but with an X870e Taichi which is renowed for good compatibility with Linux.
Good advice is to ask in the Level1Tech forums before buying new hardware.