Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Fairphone announces the €599 Fairphone 6, with a 6.31" 120Hz LTPO OLED display, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip, and enhanced modularity with 12 swappable parts

Fairphone announces the €599 Fairphone 6, with a 6.31" 120Hz LTPO OLED display, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip, and enhanced modularity with 12 swappable parts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
555 Posts 240 Posters 15 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D [email protected]

    Phone thickness is far from the only consideration. But Ok, you are right. There was space on the iPhone 7. That was also the first water resistant phone. Does this guy phone's is still IP67 compliant after all the surgery he made. And that was in 2016, when IP67 headphone jacks didn't exist. Now the phone standard is IP68. There were no IP68 compliant headphone jacks until recently, I think the ASUS Zenfone 12 is the first one.

    I think companies won't bring the headphone jack (a shame, really). But the writing is in the wall, it went away, and phones still sold like hotcakes. While those with headphone jacks aren't being bought anywhere near the same volume. So the signal is very clear, the effort to add a headphone jack — however little it may be — is not financially worth it. It is a feature that doesn't drive sales. Period.

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #536

    Now the phone standard is IP68. There were no IP68 compliant headphone jacks until recently, I think the ASUS Zenfone 12 is the first one.

    The phone I'm literally holding right now (Xperia 5V) is IP68 compliant and has a jack...

    it went away, and phones still sold like hotcakes

    Well yeah, you basically need smartphones, it's not very optional. What's your point?

    While those with headphone jacks aren’t being bought anywhere near the same volume. So the signal is very clear

    There are very little options with headphone jacks so yeah, your math is on point. Lol. How can a product that doesn't exist sale in high volumes?

    It is a feature that doesn’t drive sales. Period.

    Correlation is not causation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ulrich@feddit.orgU [email protected]

      Is it my fault when having the things in the first place is just a hacky workaround driven by corporate greed?

      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #537

      Yes, it is your fault for losing or breaking your own property. Take some responsibility. When I moved to a phone without a headphone jack while driving a car that I plug my phone in via headphone jack, I simply kept the adapter plugged in to the cable in the car. It never broke. It never got lost. It stayed there until I got a Bluetooth head unit.

      I’ve still got it in a drawer ready for if I ever needed it again, but since I’m not an audiophile with a $10k+ sound system listening to FLACs from my phone I don’t need it.

      ulrich@feddit.orgU 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • no1@aussie.zoneN [email protected]

        Can you show an example of one from 3 years ago?

        Because my experience was that most ROMs were based on AOSP/ LineageOS , which supports very few Samsung phones, and no flagships since the 2018 S10.

        And even of those, many didn't support IMS/VoLTE/VoWiFi which made them useless in any geos that didn't have 3G fallback for voice. You can't make or receive phone calls.

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #538

        Oh I just meant rooting not custom ROMs as I've never tried any. Rooted android will get you very far on its own so custom ROMs often feel like an overkill tbh

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • F [email protected]

          Yes, it is your fault for losing or breaking your own property. Take some responsibility. When I moved to a phone without a headphone jack while driving a car that I plug my phone in via headphone jack, I simply kept the adapter plugged in to the cable in the car. It never broke. It never got lost. It stayed there until I got a Bluetooth head unit.

          I’ve still got it in a drawer ready for if I ever needed it again, but since I’m not an audiophile with a $10k+ sound system listening to FLACs from my phone I don’t need it.

          ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
          ulrich@feddit.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #539

          Bullshit

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P [email protected]

            You know you’ve got not argument when you have to compare a $700 dollar phone to a $5 dongle for your argument to even make sense.

            Oh, so I should buy $100 dongles then? lol Everyone's argument about the dongles is that they're super cheap, that's why I made the comparison.

            In those phones the DAC is used primarily for phone calls.

            Oh really? And how exactly do you think that the phone is generating the audio that comes through its speaker when you're doing anything else? Like listening to music, videos, etc? Does your phone really not make a single sound apart from the audio in phone calls?

            I wasn’t talking about some cheap $5 dongle, I specifically said quality headphones

            headphone =/= dongle

            The dongle is what you connect TO the headphone. Regardless, be more specific then. What's the one you recommend? Should I buy $50 dongles then and keep them attached to my headphones? Since I use 4/5 of them does that mean that it's ok in your opinion that I now need to spend $250 in dongles instead of just having a tiny, cheap, reliable jack on my $700 phone?

            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #540

            How much more specific do I need to be when I explicitly say "USB-C headphones"? What do you think USB-C stands for?

            You could've done a single web search yo find that you can buy wired headphones that go straight into the USB-C port.No dongle required. But you're too busy foaming from the mouth like a rabid dog to even understand what I said.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G [email protected]

              How much more specific do I need to be when I explicitly say "USB-C headphones"? What do you think USB-C stands for?

              You could've done a single web search yo find that you can buy wired headphones that go straight into the USB-C port.No dongle required. But you're too busy foaming from the mouth like a rabid dog to even understand what I said.

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #541

              Well, you do need to be specific because like 99% of headphones terminate in a 3.5mm jack or a quarter inch jack. You were referring to a vert very limited subset of headphones.

              It's honestly kinda dumb to buy a headphone, which only needs an analogue voltage signal to work, that terminates in usb-c. Specially considering that there are still loads of devices that don't have that port. Even if a computer has it, it's likely that it only has 1 or 2 of them which might already be in use. For example, my work laptop has 2 usb-c and I'm using one of them to charge it and the other to connect a monitor.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ulrich@feddit.orgU [email protected]

                Bullshit

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #542

                You can’t even admit that losing something of yours is your own fault lol. We’re not going to get anything of value from you on this.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J [email protected]

                  Or there wasn't good enough engineering to begin with to achieve usb 3 speeds. Seems like they should have got it right before using it as a reason to cripple the thing further.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #543

                  Eh I don't really see a necessary use case to get angry over it.. Transfers over WiFi have been faster than USB on pretty much all phones for a while now, and way more convenient.

                  I just drop files into my phone with kde connect. It means I can even start a transfer and wonder off with the phone and the mesh network keeps it going

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #544

                    No headphone jack means I won't even consider it, very sad to see it's still the case.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • B [email protected]

                      Yes but that's still 2.1" too large to be comfortable to use for many people.

                      My 6" Pixel is just as uncomfortable to use as my 4" Nexus S was. 99.99% screen to body won't change that fact.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #545

                      I don't think that's true in the slightest. A phone 2.1" smaller in diagonal length than my current one would be smaller than a Nokia 3310.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T [email protected]

                        I don't think that's true in the slightest. A phone 2.1" smaller in diagonal length than my current one would be smaller than a Nokia 3310.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                        #546

                        Yes but the phone physically cannot be smaller than the screen.

                        So if the screen itself is too large to be comfortable, it is physically impossible to make it comfortable to use without making the screen smaller.

                        I measured the radius my thumb can reach, I know exactly the limits of my reach, and thus exactly the largest screen I can use without causing discomfort in my wrist.

                        The point I am trying to make is that the ideal phone size is personal to the individual. There is no one size fits all. Screen to body ratio cannot change that.

                        This is why, despite the screen to body ratio improving, a subset of people still ask for smaller phones.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P [email protected]

                          If I've asked a question twice and you've danced around it both times, that tells everyone what your answer is.

                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #547

                          someone who is often listening to music with their phone and wired headphones, or even just when arriving at home from work, is going to use both the charger and the jack at the same time frequently.

                          another scenario is if the person uses their phone as the microphone for their PC.

                          you can argue that both must be rare because you have never seen them done, that's my exact opinion about wireless charging

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D [email protected]

                            “It's not in front of my face, so it doesn't exists!”

                            That's literally the thinking abilities of a toddler. Wireless chargers sell like hotcakes. MagSafe charger is Apple's most popular accessory in their entire history.

                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #548

                            that's the same thinking that those apply who say people don't need jack connectors, mind you

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W [email protected]

                              someone who is often listening to music with their phone and wired headphones, or even just when arriving at home from work, is going to use both the charger and the jack at the same time frequently.

                              another scenario is if the person uses their phone as the microphone for their PC.

                              you can argue that both must be rare because you have never seen them done, that's my exact opinion about wireless charging

                              P This user is from outside of this forum
                              P This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #549

                              Funny you bring up wireless charging.

                              Does that not solve your proposed problem? You can use a usb-c to audio dongle, which often comes with better sound quality than a phones DAC, and wirelessly charge, even via many powerbanks. These are features found fairly commonly in today's phones, so problem solved?

                              W 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P [email protected]

                                Funny you bring up wireless charging.

                                Does that not solve your proposed problem? You can use a usb-c to audio dongle, which often comes with better sound quality than a phones DAC, and wirelessly charge, even via many powerbanks. These are features found fairly commonly in today's phones, so problem solved?

                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #550

                                it does not, as my phone, and afaik most phones don't support it.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • W [email protected]

                                  it does not, as my phone, and afaik most phones don't support it.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #551

                                  Sounds like a you problem, I have it on good authority that it's pretty common:

                                  how many times does the average person use wireless charging? Seriously, I haven't seen anyone do that yet, or know of someone who uses that.

                                  and yet that's still a major feature in lots of phones

                                  You've shown everyone that you can, in fact, listen to wired headphones and charge at the same time with "major features found in lots of phones", which solves your original complaint, which itself depends on some very specific scenarios.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ [email protected]

                                    how else are you supposed to connect it to cars that weren't made yesterday?

                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #552

                                    Cars have had bluetooth and usb on their radios for almost 20 years. Even older than that you can replace the stereo for like $30. My car is 2004 and i did a stereo replacement and i've got bluetooth, usb C and aux.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • anzo@programming.devA [email protected]

                                      There's a deGoogled version too!!

                                      I would prefer GrapheneOS (If I can live with the irony of getting a Pixel phone just to deGoogle it...). Sandboxing there is way better. But you lose the Repairability.. Gotta check and compare the new EU metrics too.

                                      They are just two different devices.

                                      anzo@programming.devA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      anzo@programming.devA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #553

                                      Just an update, I learnt that GrapheneOS developers are 'aggressive' towards other FLOSS projects (following comments on other thread, but you can searx grepheneos+controversy and see for yourselves).

                                      So now, I might just prefer an FP6.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B [email protected]

                                        Yes but the phone physically cannot be smaller than the screen.

                                        So if the screen itself is too large to be comfortable, it is physically impossible to make it comfortable to use without making the screen smaller.

                                        I measured the radius my thumb can reach, I know exactly the limits of my reach, and thus exactly the largest screen I can use without causing discomfort in my wrist.

                                        The point I am trying to make is that the ideal phone size is personal to the individual. There is no one size fits all. Screen to body ratio cannot change that.

                                        This is why, despite the screen to body ratio improving, a subset of people still ask for smaller phones.

                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #554

                                        Ok so you think that the old 4" screen phones should actually have been sub 2". That seems excessively small to me.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T [email protected]

                                          Ok so you think that the old 4" screen phones should actually have been sub 2". That seems excessively small to me.

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #555

                                          That is not at all what I am saying.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups