German lawmakers can’t agree whether to seek ban on far-right AfD
-
-
It's not though. Democracy relies on a bunch of environmental factors we blew through about 100 years ago. If these parties were out meeting people one to one and making a rational case, that'd be one thing. If the press was doing their job of informing everyone properly, that'd be another thing.
But then, if they were doing that, they wouldn't be so fucking dangerous. They're simply riding on propaganda which we know works every time. And since capitalism also requires propaganda, we can't shut that part down without restructuring our entire economic system, which analysts suggest might take longer than three, or even four weeks.
-
"Should we ban the Nazi party?"
The world is an onion article
-
More than half of Germany has no issue working with Nazis
https://www.yahoo.com/news/survey-narrow-majority-germans-support-114418390.html
-
I guess German schools did not try hard enough teaching kids history.
-
Short memory.
Ban them unflinchingly and completely.
-
Companion music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC2pgcagyRk
-
Politico is owned by the German equivalent of Murdoch who are actively promoting the AfD across all their media by the way.
-
That might be what people think the word means when they first hear it, but that doesn't mean we should use it that way.
-
Well if you actually want to communicate with others outside of academia, you're going to have to get used to the idea that language isn't the deliberate construct of a purely logical machine. I know it makes things more difficult than some would like to imagine it should be, but that's the price demanded of those who actually want to live in the real world.
-
So we should just do away with definitions, and go with whatever people think a word means the first time they hear it? Why?
-
The point is that you have to make a good faith effort for communication to be possible, which you are not doing here.
-
Jailing the orange diaper would've had nothing to do with betraying democracy. He committed crimes that he should've been punished for under democratically created laws. The laws simply weren't enforced.
-
When the "good faith effort" requires changing definitions, it's not a good faith effort from the other side.
-
Not like anything bad happened last time Germany started banning political parties...
I mean, I would ban them in a heartbeat, but I get their caution.
-
What was the difference last time? I'm sure you know.
-
And as we all remember, when the Nazi Party was banned 98 years ago, the problem was solved, just like that, and nothing at all happened afterwards.
-
It was solved for decades. Sorry it wasn't solved for an infinity number of years like you think it should have been.
-
If one person or a few people have a definition wrong, that's a thing that can be corrected.
If the majority of people think that's the definition, and it's been that way for decades, then you have the definition wrong.
-
Do you have data to show that a majority of people have been missing "technocracy" for decades?
