Why United Does Not Allow You To Use In-Flight Screen As Extended Display
-
Reason is a shit rag, and I don't think their slop should be posted.
-
-
Rule 34.
-
The ones that seal do provide sound isolation
-
They're just not letting their eyes get dark-adapted in the first place. They can't see anything but the phone screen, but they also don't care.
-
Then you'll still have people screencast porn to their own screen, photograph it and post it on social media with a title like "United's in-flight entertainment".
-
-
-
-
-
-
As someone with their phone set to the bottom third of the brightness spectrum almost always (unless I'm outside), I really don't understand this. Brightness is perhaps my most adjusted setting, since I use it a half dozen times a day or so. In fact, brightness is the least interesting spec when looking at a device, since I rarely run at max anyway. In fact, my computer screen I use for work is usually at 50% brightness.
How can people stand getting blasted with lumens all the time?
-
There's no reason they couldn't expose an HDMI port, or even provide a cable that runs down the seat to the tray table.
-
Yeah, that was my take as well. That, and adding the ability to plug in/connect costs money and probably isn't popular enough to make it charging for it profitable.
-
So you make a point with great arguments.
Care to elaborate?
-
As someone who finds that most "dark mode" offerings aren't dark enough, I don't understand how they can tolerate it either. I suspect it's rather like spicy food: given enough exposure, you don't notice it's spicy (or bright) until reaching a level far above what people who aren't exposed to it on a constant basis would think was acceptable.
-
-
-
The article is about extended displays though.
-
No traces but you are still sharing your financials on a screen
