Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Privacy
  3. Privacy WIN! Apple & Android Unite for Secure Messaging

Privacy WIN! Apple & Android Unite for Secure Messaging

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Privacy
privacy
35 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T [email protected]

    I can sort of see why it’s not been a priority for them. Outside of the US nobody uses SMS or the built in text apps. I just went through my phone and I haven’t had a text message that wasn’t business related since July.

    engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
    engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I had some! It's the rescue services warning you that the ice is starting to break and you shouldn't walk on it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      I This user is from outside of this forum
      I This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      They probably have a separare copy encrypted by keys under their control, but if verification codes text messages also use RCS Encryption, at least its harder for people to hack bank accounts.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        They treat this as if e2ee was the privacy grail but it's only marketing to fool people believing they're protected.

        The actual contents of the messages aren't as important for privacy. It's the Metadata and a ton of other measures rhay signal implements in their family of protocols.

        Talking about e2ee and call it private shows ignorance in what privacy entails.

        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Good enough to protect against your bank verification codes from being intercepted, asa long as the bank also uses RCS's Encryption to send the message

        engineergaming@feddit.nlE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]

          It was honestly surprising to learn that SMS/RCS/iMessage is the most common way to send messages in the US, as it hasn’t been that way in the UK for over a decade now.

          For better or worse, folks in the UK & EU all switched to apps like WhatsApp, Messenger, Viber, etc. due to better features and free international calls.

          engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
          engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          It seems like where I live, RCS is not supported on all carriers (not on mine) - but most importantly, not on all phones. The one carrier that has it says it only works on certain Samsungs (I guess also Google Pixel, but they are not officially sold, even if not unpopular). So even though they're not paid separately like SMS, I don't think anyone would be switching to it from Whatsapp or Telegram.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T [email protected]

            I can sort of see why it’s not been a priority for them. Outside of the US nobody uses SMS or the built in text apps. I just went through my phone and I haven’t had a text message that wasn’t business related since July.

            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            I use QKSMS regularly and I'm not in the US

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              We had this in XMPP a decade ago & they could have readopted the open standard instead of creating a new one. There is no track record of them not bending the rules to benefit just them anyhow—but this time it was developed exclusively by the tech giants which is absolutely for their benefit with nestled enclaves to meet the bare minimum requirements while still building the garden’s walls higher. Cabal-ass behavior.

              engineergaming@feddit.nlE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Of course you can't use it without being part of a huge tech duopoly so yay and it doesn't work without googles proprietary messaging app.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest

                  They treat this as if e2ee was the privacy grail but it's only marketing to fool people believing they're protected.

                  The actual contents of the messages aren't as important for privacy. It's the Metadata and a ton of other measures rhay signal implements in their family of protocols.

                  Talking about e2ee and call it private shows ignorance in what privacy entails.

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Exactly and if you have to use stock android or iOS to get this feature you are agreeing to so much intrusions into privacy that it's sort of moot.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Despite SMS not being secure I'm determined to stop using WhatsApp and haven't installed it on my new phone. My old phone has WhatsApp business with an auto reply saying to contact me on signal or send a text. Granted I don't have a huge contacts list but 4 people have started using Signal and the rest send a text, so this is good news in my book.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      7eter@feddit.org7 This user is from outside of this forum
                      7eter@feddit.org7 This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Remind me again when there is a FOSS application for RCS messaging

                      jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T [email protected]

                        We had this in XMPP a decade ago & they could have readopted the open standard instead of creating a new one. There is no track record of them not bending the rules to benefit just them anyhow—but this time it was developed exclusively by the tech giants which is absolutely for their benefit with nestled enclaves to meet the bare minimum requirements while still building the garden’s walls higher. Cabal-ass behavior.

                        engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                        engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        XMPP is very much a valid option nowadays too! Much easier and lighter to host than Matrix, too. I use it with my mom - Conversations is just as easy to use as Whatsapp, and maybe more pleasant.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I [email protected]

                          Good enough to protect against your bank verification codes from being intercepted, asa long as the bank also uses RCS's Encryption to send the message

                          engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                          engineergaming@feddit.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          I assumed that when it comes to SMS 2FA, simswapping is a threat much bigger than interception of the contents...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 7eter@feddit.org7 [email protected]

                            Remind me again when there is a FOSS application for RCS messaging

                            jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            https://media.tenor.com/fKMzakG8oPYAAAAM/jenn-jenn-robbins.gif

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • meldrik@lemmy.wtfM [email protected]
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jjlinux@lemmy.mlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              That's not a privacy win for anyone. What this is is a marketing win for Crapple and Google.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • engineergaming@feddit.nlE [email protected]

                                XMPP is very much a valid option nowadays too! Much easier and lighter to host than Matrix, too. I use it with my mom - Conversations is just as easy to use as Whatsapp, and maybe more pleasant.

                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                Cheogram has a better featureset on Android in my experience. Movim has quite a lot of features & good performance for a web app—which covers the folks that “don’t want to install any new apps” (generally the right skepticism, but really most F-Droid ones are safer with less worry), or platforms without good clients. The biggest pushback I have heard was bad iOS clients—but being a self-hostable service with almost exclusively free software clients, it should be of no surprise any iOS dev is lackluster, being an entirely closed platform, anti-GPL, & with a hefty fee just to list an application.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • System shared this topic on
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups