Thanks for explaining, TIL!

Give me VIII please. I want to see all of that angst in glorious 4k.

It's hard to find actual solutions when you're ignoring reality

Yeah, evidently they really, really want you to sign up. They upped the period from the first three years to as long as you own the car (it doesn't transfer to a new owner if you sell it).

Perhaps especially after this.

Englishmen: We’ve been invaded and occupied for centuries by sooo many different nation states. Which one are you again?

[image: 8c348ed8-7faf-4a0a-be76-bc3264e43ded.gif]

The error rate for human employees for the kind of errors AI makes is much, much lower. Humans make mistakes that are close to the intended task and have very little chance of being completely different. AI does the latter all the time.

In the image (text on the red banner): 政府补贴 制定门店 国补15% 最高500元 Government subsidies; Select stores only; Government subsidises up to 15%, For a maximum of ¥500 Renminbi. I'm confused, why is there a rebate for the tariff? (Or did I misinterpret it?)

With the minimal amount of work added the combined work can now have added restrictions. They're pushover licenses. Devs are free to choose whatever license they want but in the pathfinding problem of interacting with others then "protecting the source" is the wrong target node. Copyleft is a tool to help people.

I'd be more worried if there wasn't any other platforms where media can be posted to broader audience

Australia did this once. We called it "robodebt". An algorithm that falsely cut people off social security and ultimately killed some of them.

Ah yes, because the rest of the world is so great at responding to online mis/disinformation.

I reported it as wrong language and down voted.

Ooh, nice to know! It impacts the form factor a bit, but in most projects that's easy to work with

Someone made millions off of that Xeet. I prefer to call them Xcrements

That depends on the problem. I disagree w/ the author that storing blurry cat memes is what's "destroying our environment." Transportation is our biggest net polluter in terms of CO2, which is higher than all electrical generation combined. If we're want to solve CO2 emissions, we have to solve transportation, since that's the 500 pound gorilla in the room. If we look specifically at datacenters, storage makes up a tiny fraction of the overall energy use. That article mentions that datacenters probably have a similar CO2 footprint as the aviation industry, which makes up about 2.5% of the world's carbon emissions, or about 10% of the total transportation emissions from the above link. If the goal is to fix climate change, data centers are pretty far down the list in terms of priorities. Higher priorities are, roughly in this order: ground transportation - electrify or switch to something like hydrogen electrical power generation - this will directly reduce the impact of data centers, be part of 1, and solve a number of other issues residential heating - switch from fossil fuels to heat pumps for heating, which should be a relatively "drop-in" replacement and could save customers money industry - largely solved by 2, but there may need to be some shifts in certain types of production processes to reduce emissions Changing anything about data centers is way down the list of priorities, and it'll be largely solved by something much higher up. So it's really the wrong target to attack.

this is why keeping no logs of user activity i s a good idea.

Surveillance is the obvious purpose of any robot dog.