Why would'nt this work?
-
(i know i may have broken english sometimes, sorry about that)
Not at all! I couldn't tell you aren't a native speaker. Regarding a "moon elevator", or more realistically a space elevator, these kinds of Herculean physics problems are exactly what people are trying to iron out. The forces involved are astronomical.
-
That was excellent. Thank you
-
-
Or a duck.
-
NASA: "Hold my beaker."
-
-
-
Oh right. I'll edit my comment
-
Okay done i got his lids whos got the space gear and the impossible stick
-
wave function (something that does not travel) collapses (something that does not move either) faster than light (themselves?)
this word soup does not make sense
-
It's even wilder when you take the concept of ridgidity and transfer of energy out of the equation and just think in terms of pure information propagating though a light cone. Rigidity itself is a function of information.
-
Great explanation, thank you!
-
Easily. I imagine that most spacecraft are already traveling faster than the speed of stick. It's likely only a few thousand meters per second
-
-
Cool vid, thanks for sharing
-
-
This wouldn't work because the moon is more than 300k km away
-
-
That's what he meant by we'll use sticks on the other side
-
