Why would'nt this work?

[dembosain@midwest.social]

[pacattack57@lemmy.world]

[sbv@sh.itjust.works]

[chanchomanco@lemm.ee]

[spzi@lemm.ee]

Weigh on Earth or on Moon?

[theguytm3@lemmy.ml]

We're supposing that you have an herculean strengh and that weight is not a problem

[haveyoupaidyourdues@lemmy.world]

Large if factual

[typhoonigator@lemmy.world]

[theguytm3@lemmy.ml]

[propter_hog@hexbear.net]

(i know i may have broken english sometimes, sorry about that)

Not at all! I couldn't tell you aren't a native speaker. Regarding a "moon elevator", or more realistically a space elevator, these kinds of Herculean physics problems are exactly what people are trying to iron out. The forces involved are astronomical.

[makingstuffforfun@lemmy.ml]

That was excellent. Thank you

[evilsandwichman@hexbear.net]

[nospotofground@lemmy.world]

Or a duck.

[ech@lemm.ee]

NASA: "Hold my beaker."

[crabandbroom@lemmy.ml]

[cutecity@hexbear.net]

[tkk13909@sopuli.xyz]

Oh right. I'll edit my comment

[quadhammer@lemmy.world]

Okay done i got his lids whos got the space gear and the impossible stick

[vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de]

wave function (something that does not travel) collapses (something that does not move either) faster than light (themselves?)

this word soup does not make sense

[karmiclychee@sh.itjust.works]

It's even wilder when you take the concept of ridgidity and transfer of energy out of the equation and just think in terms of pure information propagating though a light cone. Rigidity itself is a function of information.