male voters

[email protected]

I’m European so

so stick to being misinformed about your own region's politics.

[email protected]

There's 100 people in the room

10 think you're annoying, 80 love you, 10 dont care

A "net" when talking numbers is the difference, so you would have a net favorability of 70%.
Because it's the people who like you minus the people who dislike you, and no one cares about the people who don't care.

Quick edit:

I didn't check if that 73% is real or just to make a point, but if it is, 73% net favorability is obviously insanely popular. Cracking 50% overall is pretty much considered a shoe in

[email protected]

Yeah, if only he wasn’t obstructed like Obama was at every turn by republicans

You do know Biden as VP was the dog whistle to show the wealthy they could vote for Obama and nothing would get done ...

Right?

It's wasn't just Republicans that's stopped M4A, just like back with FDR the "moderates" sided with the Republicans.

Biden said he wanted some things to happen, but never tried because he kept saying he didn't know if it would work

If you think Biden legitimately put effort in for two years Dems had majority ...

Why the fuck did Biden spend so much time calling himself the fucking "Senate whisper"?

His whole deal was he could work with Republicans, and when we got majorities he threw his hands up and said trying would be a waste of fucking time.

If you didn't pay attention to any of that, the last election must have made no sense to you at all...

[email protected]

You do know Biden as VP was the dog whistle to show the wealthy they could vote for Obama and nothing would get done

who did the ACA? who came up with that plan? Lets hear it finally.

[email protected]

The media is presenting the current DNC as identical to prior ones ...

Because they're scared of a FDR like movement from the current one.

And ignorant people on social media dont know how the DNC works or what a chair even does.

We won the war over the party, the billionaires lost.

So now they're banking on how uninformed voters are so they can convince them to double down on changing DNC leadership so neoliberals get the wheel again.

You can't explain it to them, because if they weren't idiots they'd already know all of this considering were talking about people that choose to discuss politics online.

You'd think they'd be up to date on what happened six months ago, but they have no idea

[email protected]

At this point, the Dem party consider themselves retired.; enjoying their investor's cash, and playing fiddle while DC burns.

[email protected]

You honestly don't get?

Like. This isn't a bit you're doing, you legitimately don't understand?

[email protected]

"Everything I don't like is misinformation. Don't ask questions."

[email protected]

who did the ACA? who came up with that plan? Lets hear it finally

Mit Romney?

Although technically when it got past Dem moderates it was a more conservative version of Romney's plan...

Do people still not know that in 2025?

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/23/451200436/mitt-romney-finally-takes-credit-for-obamacare

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/23/mitt-romney-admits-romneycare-had-to-precede-obamacare.html

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/how-mitt-romney-saved-obamacare-msna626361

https://www.politifact.com/article/2012/mar/20/romneycare-and-obamacare-can-you-tell-difference/

I'm constantly surprised how people can be so opinionated, but never curious enough to learn....

Like, that's my whole point

Obama sold us "fixing healthcare"

And we literally ended up with a more conservative version of the Republican plan. Because moderate Dems sided with Republicans.

Were you agreeing wit me and I just "whooshed"?

[email protected]

no one could deny it in good faith? They couldn't for 70 years. You are all only now crying about it because you hate democrats. Do you think palestinians suddenly think you are on their side? No. you are all fake. Just like trumps hair, just like trumps make up, fake up from the waist down. "OH NO GENOCIDE! the same one thats been happening for decades I suddenly care about it, now that i hate biden and obama!"

get outta here with your 'concern'

[email protected]

Yes, ideally, but the US system is completely rigged in a million different ways to make the emergence of a meaningful 3rd party almost impossible.

The way we award seats, first past the post, is horrendously flawed, and means that if every specifically defined area just barely has a majority... the net effect is a government that is way, way out of sync with what the broader population actually wants.

And this is all rigged by regularly and precisely redrawing all those specific geographic areas to make it so they are either clearly gonna be Rep or Dem, or 51-49 split that looks 'reasonably fair' on paper, but in practice, almost always goes to that 51.

...

Ironically, if Musk goes through with making his own third party... he, the literal richest man in the world, is basically the only person that could possibly pull that off.

That is how huge of a role money plays in US politics.

Takes the richest man in the world to be even maybe potentially able to counteract all the rest of the combined lobbying money of other corporate lobbyists... and thats assuming he was able to basically shut the fuck up and let at least strategically competent people run the whole show.

Going by the probably actually legit poll Elon commissioned to be run about possible support for an Elon party, here are the numbers I ended up with:

(will update in a moment, gotta go find my old post)

...

Ok, heres the full poll:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R4pZVo0ZnrQyElZQzdNtt7CQ1zwTypuS/view

Here's some rough, but reasonable math to extrapolate.

If you say half of the 'somewhat likely's actually go for it, then you get this:

Republicans who join Elon Party: 34.25%

Independents who join Elon Party: 28.25%

Democrats who join Elon Party: 13.75%

...

There are more Dem voters than Republicans.

But there are also more independents than either.

Roughly 32% Reps, 33% Dems, 35% Indp.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/the-partisanship-and-ideology-of-american-voters/

So, throw that in with those previous calcs, and you end up with:

Reps: ~21%

Dems: ~28.5%

Elons: ~25.5%

Indps: ~25%

or, normalized to remove remaining Indps:

Reps: 28%, Dems: 38%, Elons: 34%.

...

So... theoretically, the Dems are still the largest, Elon is now second behind them, and the Reps are now a third party, less popular than having no solid political affiliation.

So if Elon actually goes through with this, I think you end up with a good number of corpo Dems leaving the Dems, so the Dems now have an easier time shifting to the left.

The Reps lose 1/3 of their voters, and basically just become a cult of idiot racist nazis, paleocons, theocrats, MAGA nutjobs.

Elon party ... basically becomes the 'centrist'/libertarian/ancap/corpo party.

[email protected]

Mit Romney?

yep, and guess who suddenly opposed it once it was put forward? Who's party opposed it? who is trying to get rid of it?
Who called it "obama-care" ? and why wasnt it "romney Care?" I am also surprised at how people who are seemingly smart can watch a political party do a 180 degree turn on their own designs just to obstruct. and then literally say their obstruction is the fault of the opposition. Its like watching a child being told to step on a lego and then the parent tells them its not their fault.
Like. Little. Babies.

[email protected]

Understand what? That we're supposed to accept the smears of people like Jeffries and Gilibrand as "endorsements" just because centrists want to maintain the ridiculous fiction that party leadership doesn't work against progressives?

[email protected]

Right ...

So what about the elected Democrats who said Romenys plan had to become more conservative for them to vote for it?

Everyone on the correct side has a D by their name, you seem to get that...

You just don't understand that everyone with a D by their isn't on the correct side

Every square is a rectangle, but not every rectangle is a square

I hope that got thru to you, but I'll never know

[email protected]

I mean, you've spent this entire conversation conveniently ignoring the actions of the democratic party against progressives.

[email protected]

Well, one of us wanted biden to stop selling weapons for the genocide you've done nothing but equivocate in favor of.

I don't know where you're getting the idea that I hate obama.

[email protected]

I'm fucking trans, stop knee-jerking. I'm absolutely mocking liberalism because they're center right at best and absolutely complicit in the rise of fascism.

[email protected]

not a dude, but thanks

edit: thanks for the edit

[email protected]

I only saw your comment because I signed in after the page loaded.

So I'll go ahead and answer your question:

That the people currently smearing Mamdaninarent "the party" they're the ones whose wing just got the boot from the DNC. That's why they created project 29, they're desperate for Dems to focus on something they control, and they don't control the DNC anymore.

The way the DNC (the party) is structured, is the Chair has 100% control and zero accountability.

In February Ken Martin was seated chair.

Here's what "the party" is saying about Mamdani:

Amna Nawaz:

What do you take away from Zohran Mamdani's New York City mayoral Democratic primary win? Are there lessons there for the party or the races?

Ken Martin:

Well, first, it was a brilliant campaign. And there's a lot of lessons.

One is, he campaigned for something. And this is a critical piece. We can't just be in a perpetual state of resisting Donald Trump. Of course, we have to resist Donald Trump. There's no doubt about it for all the reasons we just talked about. But we also have to give people a sense of what we're for, what the Democratic Party is fighting for, and what we would do if they put us back in power.

And that's really critical. And I think that's one of the lessons from Mamdani's campaign, is that he focused on affordability. He focused on a message that was resonant with voters, and he campaigned for something, not against other people or against other things. He campaigned on a vision of how he was going to make New York City a better place to live.

I think that's one of the lessons. The other lessons, of course, is the tactics he used to get his message out, both a very aggressive in-person campaigning, meeting voters where they're at, and then also in those digital spaces, using very creative messaging to cut through the noise and to get to voters in an inexpensive but authentic way.

There's a lot to learn from that campaign, and I'm excited to learn more.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/dnc-chair-on-the-path-to-winning-back-voters-and-lessons-democrats-can-learn-from-mamdani

For now at least, the party is back on the side of the people.

And that's not even getting into the other stuff he's doing. You won't hear it on MSM, because MSM is owned by billionaires. They'd rather have a third trump term than a progressive.

Don't fall for their propaganda that today's DNC has anything to do with the DNC from 2024 and earlier.

[email protected]

The people: Can we have some help?

Republicans: No.

Democrats: No. #blm #lgbt

agnos.is Forums

male voters