Grand Theft Auto VI and Grand Theft Auto Online Could Be Sold Separately; Rockstar Is Targeting Solid 30 FPS on Consoles, According to Former Animator

[k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works]

That is only if the game released on both consoles simultaneously, the ps4 version of gtav came out years ago, they deserved to charge for the upgrade...

And i am the opposite of a rockstar fanboy.

[goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org]

Maybe it'll also actually get sp dlc?

[shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works]

If the biggest game of the decade charges $100, every triple A game will charge the same, and other games will probably be more expensive as well, and in most cases it'll be more money for the same steadily decreasing quality, at least in the triple A market.

[livelm@lemmy.zip]

Good Lord, so much marketing about "next-gen" yet 60 still ain't a guarantee ‍️

[flamekebab@piefed.social]

There are many things I'd spend more on, but gaming is something that I can spend a lot of hours on without necessarily enjoying. As in, the experiences are often weirdly compulsive and before I know it I've tanked eighty hours without really enjoying it all that much.

I collected all the submarine collectibles in GTA V - do I think that was more fun than a party with friends? Absolutely not. Did it take more time? Most definitely.

[noxypaws@pawb.social]

Not me. I think it's insane to ship a PS5 game that performs that poorly even on non-"pro" consoles

[thermal_shock@lemmy.world]

Same, even on my old GPU I'd adjust quality until I got stable 60, otherwise no thanks.

[squizzy@lemmy.world]

I was looking at it more in terms of using free time, not a one to one comparison

[qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de]

If they do it will be $60 for single player and $30 for online instead of $60 for everything.

[blackmist@feddit.uk]

Very rare to see 30fps games on PS5 that don't have a performance option to get to 60.

Especially action games.

[mynameisatticus@lemmy.world]

From what i have seen, 60fps is acceptable for High Settings, 30fps is acceptable when Ray tracing is turned on

[omegalemmy@discuss.online]

No, 40 and 50 look good enough though, idk why people like 30 as a standard

[yournamehere@lemm.ee]

say it with me

EN SHITTI FICATION

[sorgan71@lemmy.world]

My 144 hz monitor has ruined my ability to enjoy normal refresh rates in games. I need a support group for this ffs.

[viscloreader@lemmy.world]

Honestly I'm fine with this as long as the graphics justifies the framerate.

[generalemergency@lemmy.world]

It's comment threads like this that just show how absolutely clueless G*mers are.

[ampersandrew@lemmy.world]

First off, that fake word sucks. Second, it doesn't really apply here anyway.

[ampersandrew@lemmy.world]

It's a number that divides easily into 120, which mattered more for old TVs, and it's far enough over the threshold to trick our minds into seeing a bunch of still frames as a moving thing.

[yournamehere@lemm.ee]

it does

rockstar like any ultracapitalistic brand loves money so much they'd do anything.

30fps...because switch2...because money.

i expect their onlinestuff to be prime ea lootbox and ai upsell shit. get a yacht for 1 million.

and again a like gta5 and 4...a story so superficial it will intrigue all the 15yr old alphamales and ppl that never grew up.

why dont you just join this milc metaverse stuff? more enshittification without the extra hurdles.

[wordbox@lemmy.world]

It'll be a healthy decision