Grand Theft Auto VI and Grand Theft Auto Online Could Be Sold Separately; Rockstar Is Targeting Solid 30 FPS on Consoles, According to Former Animator

[douchebagmcswag@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

I'm tempted to hold out on the FOMO and wait for the inevitable PC release

[douchebagmcswag@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Bro if 30 fps is their target, I guarantee Switch 2 is going to get a version of this

[solidshake@lemmy.world]

Not really. There's a reason the PS5 $10 upgrade isn't compatible with the older versions in terms of online play. They updated a lot of graphics and models plus the 60fps. There are a lot of comparison videos on YouTube if you're interested in even looking. The most noticable are like, damage models in cars is better, smoke looks more realistic and was redone, fire looks and acts better. Lighting is much better. Etc.

[solidshake@lemmy.world]

Yeah. I have a PS5 and I heard gta 6 won't launch on PC right away, but then I heard it is coming to PC lol. So idk. I'm almost hitting 40 and playing on my couch and tv has been more fun lately. But sometimes I just know a game will run much better on my PC.

What I should do is put my current build into a super small box with an external PSU and just install steam os and hook it up to my tv

[squizzy@lemmy.world]

Meh I'd drop 100 plus on standard night out. I dont buy many games but buying God of War Ragnarok for 30 and getting 100 hours of entertainment was well worth it, to the point I regret not buying it full price day one.

[k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works]

That is only if the game released on both consoles simultaneously, the ps4 version of gtav came out years ago, they deserved to charge for the upgrade...

And i am the opposite of a rockstar fanboy.

[goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org]

Maybe it'll also actually get sp dlc?

[shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works]

If the biggest game of the decade charges $100, every triple A game will charge the same, and other games will probably be more expensive as well, and in most cases it'll be more money for the same steadily decreasing quality, at least in the triple A market.

[livelm@lemmy.zip]

Good Lord, so much marketing about "next-gen" yet 60 still ain't a guarantee ‍️

[flamekebab@piefed.social]

There are many things I'd spend more on, but gaming is something that I can spend a lot of hours on without necessarily enjoying. As in, the experiences are often weirdly compulsive and before I know it I've tanked eighty hours without really enjoying it all that much.

I collected all the submarine collectibles in GTA V - do I think that was more fun than a party with friends? Absolutely not. Did it take more time? Most definitely.

[noxypaws@pawb.social]

Not me. I think it's insane to ship a PS5 game that performs that poorly even on non-"pro" consoles

[thermal_shock@lemmy.world]

Same, even on my old GPU I'd adjust quality until I got stable 60, otherwise no thanks.

[squizzy@lemmy.world]

I was looking at it more in terms of using free time, not a one to one comparison

[qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de]

If they do it will be $60 for single player and $30 for online instead of $60 for everything.

[blackmist@feddit.uk]

Very rare to see 30fps games on PS5 that don't have a performance option to get to 60.

Especially action games.

[mynameisatticus@lemmy.world]

From what i have seen, 60fps is acceptable for High Settings, 30fps is acceptable when Ray tracing is turned on

[omegalemmy@discuss.online]

No, 40 and 50 look good enough though, idk why people like 30 as a standard

[yournamehere@lemm.ee]

say it with me

EN SHITTI FICATION

[sorgan71@lemmy.world]

My 144 hz monitor has ruined my ability to enjoy normal refresh rates in games. I need a support group for this ffs.

[viscloreader@lemmy.world]

Honestly I'm fine with this as long as the graphics justifies the framerate.