The So-Called “Free Speech Warriors” – Even in Switzerland, Speaking Out Can Get You Arrested
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So they should arrest Israelis on sight too right?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Switzerland is in Schengen area and in EFTA but not in EU.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Switzerland is in Schengen, but didn't join until 2004.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Congrats on confirming that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And how does this make him an islamist?
You just completly proved my point that the word "islamist" is just utterly arbitrary and used to hide racism at this point.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Apologies again, but that is nonsense.
The NZZ ran a defamatory hit piece and then this journalist, a 53 year old man mind you, was suddenly plucked off the street by plainclothes cops.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You got no brain cells mate
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Mossad and the IDF are 100% terrorist organizations so I'd be fine with that yeah.
What, did you think that was a gotcha moment?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Youre an idiot
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Apparently since 2024, according to this
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/switzerland/visa/
Missed that…
So i messed up that “Einreiseverbot” and “visa” is not the same. I think any non Swiss person can be refused to enter the country, if you are popular enough that fedpol fears about safety of the people in Switzerland.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Apparently since 2024, according to this
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/switzerland/visa/
Missed that…
So i messed up that “Einreiseverbot” and “visa” is not the same. I think any non Swiss person can be refused to enter the country, if you are popular enough that fedpol fears about safety of the people in Switzerland.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thank you!
Apparently since 2024, according to this
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/switzerland/visa/
Missed that…
So i messed up that “Einreiseverbot” and “visa” is not the same. I think any non Swiss person can be refused to enter the country, if you are popular enough that fedpol fears about safety of the people in Switzerland.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Umm, in the article I posted is nowhere written islamist. Only extremist supporting for palestine (and hamas as it seems).
Fedpol will ban any too popular person it thinks has connections to hamas from entering Switzerland
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You think NZZ has enough power to convince fedpol to ban any too popular individual from entering the country?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But he is guilty of neither
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Palestinians have a legal right to resist occupation even violently
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Palestinians have a right to armed resistance. This right is protected under international laws.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No they are not.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
More western hypocrisy and racism. Nothing new.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nathan J. Robinson compares Palestinian political violence against the Israeli occupation to the Ukrainian counteroffensives against the Russian occupation.[61] Robinson further compares Palestinian rocket attacks into Israeli territory to Ukrainian attacks that crossed into Russian territory.[61] He concludes that both Palestinians and Ukrainians have the right to resist, and doesn't support Israel's nor Russia's right to self-defense against such violence.[61] (Robinson emphasizes that right to resist does not justify violence against civilians[61])