Russia Not on US Tariff List Despite Broad Global Reach | Sweden Herald
-
3 billion is nothing.
I wonder how much the EU imports.
wrote 9 days ago last edited by3 billion is nothing.
Cool, can I borrow $3 billion?
Trump put tariffs on uninhibited islands, which is literally $0 in trade.
-
Im going to need some serious evidence that the sitting US president is not a natural born citizen and therefore is not actually the president.
wrote 9 days ago last edited byWell, he could just show his birth certificate, right?
-
The US consistently runs a trade deficit with Russia.
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4621.html
The US has a trade surplus with the UK, but still applied a 10% tariff to them.
wrote 9 days ago last edited bySo is that trading economics website just BS, then?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 9 days ago last edited by
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
-
I wonder why...
wrote 9 days ago last edited byThat picture is one of the funniest I’ve ever seen. Absolutely a classic.
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 9 days ago last edited byIt’s almost like they couldn’t get this from Canada anymore…for some reason…
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 8 days ago last edited bythe same is true for other countries on this list. nearly all of them for example
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byThe real key resource that Russia holds has to be a video of Trump on Epsteins Island.
-
The US has been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the last decade. We aren't tariffing them because we aren't trading with them.
We also aren't tariffing Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea, for the same reasons.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byit's funny that this is being downvoted. lemmy is basically reddit. rooting for the good guys, but also dogshit stupid
-
wrote 8 days ago last edited by
Here's a treat, don't consume them all at once: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5961853/Trump-ruthlessly-mocked-social-media-disgraceful-performance-Putin.html
-
Surely American trades some products? Where does Russian vodka come from?
wrote 8 days ago last edited byidaho i think
-
I was fine with like 80% of Obama and like 60% of Clinton's actual policies while enjoying the economy that I don't credit him for. But then W Bush was like a 10% and Trump 1 maybe 10% (Warp Speed, passing the vast majority of Covid stimulus, ironically all the stuff he's against now) and I'm batting zero so far on Trump 2 but I assume at some point he'll do something I agree with.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byThe only possibility of me agreeing with this old fuck is him stepping down as President... But then we would have to deal with a Vance Presidency and I'm not sure that would be better
-
Maybe, but apparently we're tariffing multiple uninhabited islands. It would seem that active trade is not a perquisite for tariffs these days. can't be having people move out there and not getting tariffed in the future.
I hope he puts tariffs on Mars next. Maybe after he falls out with musk.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byThey are eating the dogs and now they are tariffing the penguins.
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 8 days ago last edited bynow explain why Russia is uniquely in this position or i user note you as a russian agent
-
As much as I despise Obama for vastly expanding our extrajudicial drone strike policy..... All things put into perspective, yeah he was pretty decent.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byyeah. rip abdulrahman alawaki though
-
Maybe, but apparently we're tariffing multiple uninhabited islands. It would seem that active trade is not a perquisite for tariffs these days. can't be having people move out there and not getting tariffed in the future.
I hope he puts tariffs on Mars next. Maybe after he falls out with musk.
-
Trump is definitely a Russian asset.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byUS is the richest country in the world and the one with the largest and most advanced army. To me it sound quite unlikely to believe that the president of USA is controlled by russia (a country that is 10 times less rich).
-
it's funny that this is being downvoted. lemmy is basically reddit. rooting for the good guys, but also dogshit stupid
wrote 8 days ago last edited byDownvoted because it’s wrong : We aren’t tariffing them because we aren’t trading with them.
So are some inhabited islands which are hit by tariffs. Maybe the dogshit stupid is the one not seeing the ties between trump and putin.
-
He slapped a 50% tarrif on Lesotho, so it's clearly not about size or impact.
And the UK got a 10% tariff applied even though the US doesn't have a goods trade deficit with them.
wrote 8 days ago last edited bySome people are saying that this is cause Trump likes us.
-
You can view this one of two ways, possibly both:
- Krasnov
- Trump apparently was doing these tariffs based on trade deficits (Which is stupid on its own, if your dentist doesn't buy the widgets you sell, that's not a tariff.), if Russia wasn't running one, then there you go.
To rebuke 2 I present the following- https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia
U.S. total goods trade with Russia were an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024. U.S. goods exports to Russia in 2024 were $526.1 million, down 12.3 percent ($73.5 million) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from Russia totaled $3.0 billion in 2024, down 34.2 percent ($1.6 billion) from 2023. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a 37.5 percent decrease ($1.5 billion) over 2023.
Based on that math, with the CNN article I linked for the formula we get - (2,500,000,000 / 3,000,000,000) * 1/2 = 0.416666...
So Russia should have a 41% tariff.
wrote 8 days ago last edited byAnd that's how you end up in Guantanamo.
