Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Don't fix the problem just change the parameters

Don't fix the problem just change the parameters

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
371 Posts 135 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    V This user is from outside of this forum
    V This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #360

    Schools removing books as teenagers cannot read them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I [email protected]

      It could be to deal with learning disabilities not the average kid which makes it mostly false.

      Also a recommendation doesn’t mean it happened.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #361

      My son has down syndrome, he did better with analog because you can see the motion and time left in an hour, whereas digital was abstract and he didn't really grasp 47 was getting close to 60 etc.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #362

        Next schools will start removing textbooks because students cannot read. They will replace with audio books.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #363

          Imagine falling for this boomer rage bait when half the details are obviously and clearly censored.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • T [email protected]

            I'm 35. Math major. Work in STEM. Well educated.

            I hate analogue clocks. Why use subpar way of reading time if digital is so much better?

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #364

            They are actually a helpful way to show passage of time visually, without abstract math knowledge. For example my son has downsydrome, he could read time from analog and understand passage of time and time left on it, but numbers counting up to 60 was abstract.. Like its 47 minutes past 5 how close to the hour is it getting? No clue unless he wrote it out as a math question and did the subtraction. But for him those were meaningless numbers anyway. 15 was no different than 45 for him. But visual cues of quarter past and quarter to made sense for him

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • juliebean@lemmy.zipJ [email protected]

              Its also cool to just be able to build a physical mechanism which digital clocks have no real feasible option to do

              i am delighted to be able to introduce you to flip clocks.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #365

              I love flip clocks

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H [email protected]

                Dated does not mean obsolete. But it's hard to deny a digital clock is superior in almost every way.

                Unlike the other examples you're giving, I fail to see in what aspect an analog clock beats a digital one. Sure they have a certain charm, but functionally they're just behind their digital counterpart.

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #366

                For my son, that has downsydrome, analogs clocks made sense for him because he could see the time passing or time remaining to the hour, but digital requires abstract number concepts he struggled with. 15 or 45 didn't really mean anything to him sizewise, they are both 2 digit numbers. So he would struggle to grasp the time passing or time left... And making things worse we count 1-99 before the next unit but clocks are 1-59. How much time before 6 when it's 5:47? Becomes a math equation, but a glance on the clock is readily apparent.

                W 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • D [email protected]

                  45 year old here...I'm pretty sure I've never bought an analog clock and I think it would be weird for a school—or any place, really—to have one. I'm not surprised kids don't learn outdated technology and anybody who is mad about it should pick up a slide rule.

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #367

                  a slide rule

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • M [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #368

                    No time for learning, only tests

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • S [email protected]

                      I feel like I'm going insane reading these comments about how difficult it is to read analog clocks, how it needs too much understanding of maths, how it takes too long,...

                      Can someone please confirm: you just look, for a fraction of a second, at the clock face and know the time, right?

                      Learning to read the clock was like... A couple of lessons and some homework in the 2nd grade, and everyone got it.

                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #369

                      Understanding the concept is fast. Getting good at sight-reading a clock face actually takes time to get familiar with it. If you only ever really see the clock in school, and You can choose to ignore it for phones or other digital clocks, you're never gonna get good enough at it that you'll be as fast as checking a phone.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B [email protected]

                        ...which by the way is just reading the number the freaking shadow points at...

                        And how do you read an analog clock? By looking at the number the arm points at. Learning how to read the clock is not just "what number is it on" but it's getting familiar with the clock face so you can read it quickly. It's like the difference between spelling and reading.

                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                        #370

                        You are right, nothing to argue against here. What I'm arguing against is just that digital clocks are somehow the successor of analog clock, which they are not. There is a reason why digital clocks are now everywhere and that's mainly cost. It's far cheaper to add a digital clock (sometimes just software because the hardware had a (segmented) display anyway). Nobody would add an analog clock to a microwave, because why would you. But because you need the display anyway to show the remaining time, why not show the actual time when there is nothing in it.

                        The other thing I'm arguing against is the claim that digital clocks are easier to read. That's just wrong. Assuming you have roughly the same amount of exposure to both types of clocks. Children about 3-5 have no problem understanding analog clocks (just focus their attention to the hour hand at first) but I have yet to see three/four year old kids reading and understanding digital clocks. Digital clocks are more like actual reading and you need a pretty solid understanding of time already to interpret what you read. An analog clock on the other side doesn't assume you know how long an hour is, quite the contrary, it helps children develop a feeling for how long minutes and hours are.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B [email protected]

                          For my son, that has downsydrome, analogs clocks made sense for him because he could see the time passing or time remaining to the hour, but digital requires abstract number concepts he struggled with. 15 or 45 didn't really mean anything to him sizewise, they are both 2 digit numbers. So he would struggle to grasp the time passing or time left... And making things worse we count 1-99 before the next unit but clocks are 1-59. How much time before 6 when it's 5:47? Becomes a math equation, but a glance on the clock is readily apparent.

                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #371

                          Exactly. And that's also true for young children. Reading digital clocks is exactly that... reading. It doesn't mean you understand what it means or how to interpret it. Analog clocks however are a great tool at actually get a feeling for time.

                          I think the biggest issue judging by the comment section is that most Americans (at least it seems that way) are almost never exposed to analog clocks.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups