'Everything I Say Leaks,' Zuckerberg Says in Leaked Meeting Audio
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
True, IE following you around the web and building a profile on you even if you don't have a Facebook account.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I remember reading this - IIRC the kingdom had an independant archivists division that was not under the control of the king, for the sole reason that kings would try to fit the narrative to their benefit.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh no...is someone taking your privacy?
That's interesting...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
he owns 14% of Meta.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I wonder if he realizes that's because no one around him respects or likes him?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That was a great read. Thanks!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
presidential library
It's probably a human trafficking hub, his friends check out people.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If someone out journalists email in every single email distro, and it stayed there past and upgrade so no one knew who did it, and every single internal memo was simply sent to a new reporter... That would be so damn funny. You know they got email distro's with thousands of emails... Wouldn't have been hard todo 2-3 yrs ago...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No, so try to keep it short.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's a building with his name on it, I don't think he cares what it is or does.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Dumbass Oligarch complains about having to watch what they say.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
(not exactly a reply to you but a general reaction to all the news related to tech giants and Trump since the inauguration)
My take on the Linux "ban" is that it probably was intended to be a soft shadow ban (but something went wrong) on free software and open source alternatives. These companies are at the top, they now have the money and the government, there is only one thing that can bring them down: the people. It's as simple as just deactivating or deleting your facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Google accounts (talking to those with an account). There was life before them, there was internet before them and there are alternatives (we are using one right now). Yes, there are a lot of benefits to using these platforms but what's gonna be? Continue to fuel these companies by complaining about them and their CEOs and Trump, on their platforms, or leave and stop being part of the problem?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
“The Art of the Deal”
The book Trump has never even read (according to the guy who actually wrote it).
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Them stop talking Mark.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I really think this is the exception rather than the rule. People who know what endocrine disruptors are, understand epigenetics, and understand how prenatal hormone environments can affect brain development probably almost all universally support trans people.
It's like global warming: 99 percent of smart scientists agree it exists, and the remaining 1 percent have random reasons to think otherwise.
The thing is people who understand (on even a low level) epigenetics, prenatal hormones, endocrine disruptors, and how brain structural changes can impact senses of gender probably comprise less than 1 percent of 1 percent of the population. Most people are very dumb and on lemmy, the average IQ is probably 1 SD above normal, meaning the average lemmy user is easily in the top 20% of IQs. The average person is so unintelligent relative to a lemmy user it's like comparing an atom to Jupiter. The Musks (autism) and Dawkins (old age and cognitive inflexibility) of the world are not typical of the intelligent people in society, they are just high profile outliers. Almost everyone intelligent supports trans people and those that don't are cognitively defective. Vance at one point thought he was gay and dressed like a woman. Being a bisexual who chooses not to act on same-sex urges perhaps creates extreme cognitive dissonance or perhaps Vance is less hostile towards trans people and is poltiically savy. I just don't think anyone with any intelligence can be hostile to trans people unless there is something impacting their brain in a negative way (extreme lack of empathy, religion, extreme cognitive inflexibility, extreme cognitive dissonance).
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Then maybe you should shut your Trump dick sucking mouth, champ.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
With that hair he could pass for a hobbit.
Dildo Baggins, CEO of Meta
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Your internal meetings constitute legitimate interests and will be shared with our 8 billion partners
[ ok ]