Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.
-
The East India Company is the first example that comes to mind. I'm sure others.
I really don't think we are living through unprecedented times, unfortunately. People have sucked for as long as we've existed.
-
Who should care about petty stuff .
Wether it's the orange clown trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the little unwashed cokehead making a point of calling Kiev Kiyv.
I'm surprised Google, that is100% a US regime tool didn't rename that Chinese province already. -
And I'm saying it's just a name. Call it whatever you want. He means it as a distraction. There's more important things
-
See, I learned this in Spanish class in my American high school, and I don't think that linguistic fact stuck with me! Thanks
-
California should rather join Denmark.
-
If you disapprove of internet companies caving to authoritarian politics, I have bad news for you about Yandex
-
Yeah, "America".
-
Still ignoring what I wrote.
-
-
-
Yeah, I still find it impressive how good mastodon and lemmy are given the limitations.
For sure, and that is possible for personal things, but for social things it’s almost impossible to live without some features.
People don’t want to step down their level of comfort when it comes to WhatsApp (where I live people don’t use SMS because they’re limited), so you’re forced to either keep your contacts (which includes family) or move to signal/threema/session/matrix/etc. But have no one to talk to
-
We did it with Lemmy. It CAN be done!
-
-
-
So you are gonna have to provide a source explaining how the president using an executive order to rename international water is “policy” that Google must follow.
It's the executive branch. It would be the same as if Congress did the same, and passed a law saying "The Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America." There's no source required, it's literally how the US Government works, but if you want one; American University Law Review (2009) - The Limits of Executive Power:
The President has broad discretion in choosing how to exercise these implied powers. Second, these implied powers are not plenary in nature. They are subject to three basic limitations: (1) the President may not, without congressional authorization, use these powers to change domestic law or create or alter existing legal obligations; (2) these powers are subject to regulation by Congress; and (3) in the event of a conflict between the exercise of these powers and congressional legislation, the latter prevails.
There's no federal law establishing the name of the Gulf of Mexico, so there's no conflict with the first limitation. No one in Congress is willing to stop him, so no conflict with the second. And there's no conflict with existing congressional legislation, so there's no conflict with the third. So therefore the executive order is within the power of the executive branch.
Because Google is a US company and operates within the US, it has to follow US policy. The President just changed US policy to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico... So they either have to comply or be sued by the executive for not following US policy--which they'll lose.
They you’ll have to explain why I, as a Canadian, have to see this stupid renaming in parentheses.
Because again, Google is a US company. So if you want to see Gulf of Mexico again, use any map provider that isn't from a US company.
If the US truely doesn’t have a system beyond “once the president orders it, it’s renamed.”
That's an extreme oversimplification of what's going on here. But it kinda outlines how important it is to elect good people, huh?
-
The executive order doesn't conflict with anyone's freedom of speech... The President didn't release an executive order saying "no one is allowed to call it the Gulf of Mexico anymore!"
I'm not going to type it all out again, but here you go: https://lemm.ee/post/55471251/18276179
-
Here you go;
American University Law Review (2009) - The Limits of Executive Power:
The President has broad discretion in choosing how to exercise these implied powers. Second, these implied powers are not plenary in nature. They are subject to three basic limitations: (1) the President may not, without congressional authorization, use these powers to change domestic law or create or alter existing legal obligations; (2) these powers are subject to regulation by Congress; and (3) in the event of a conflict between the exercise of these powers and congressional legislation, the latter prevails.
There's no conflict and therefore within the power of the executive branch.
-
That's fully within the right of Mexico as a country, but that has nothing to do with anything that I've said here.
Going forward, the official US policy (because of this executive order) is that it's the Gulf of America. No amount of suing Google will change that.
-
It doesn't "rename" anything. It means the official US position is that the Gulf of Mexico doesn't exist and instead it's the Gulf of America. It's not forcing anyone to call it that other than for official purposes, like in Governmental memos and official US documents, least of all foreign Governments or their people.
The US doesn't own the Gulf. We can't unilaterally change the name. But when the US Government officially refers to the Gulf, it will now be called the Gulf of America. That's what the executive order did.
-
Because it's relevant to the region you're looking at and I'm pretty sure the UK hasn't taken a firm/legal stance either way. Also not sure how your comment is supposed to relate to my point? Mexico doesn't have any more right to tell other countries what to call the Gulf than the US or any other country that's totally outside of any sane jurisdiction
