FTC investigates “tech censorship,” says it’s un-American and may be illegal
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
so musk will be investigated over how he runs xitter, right?
-
so musk will be investigated over how he runs xitter, right?
He’s already investigated himself and found that Xitter is a bastion of freedom. Same goes for Truth Social.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Compelled speech it is then?
So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?
Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Defunded in 3…2…
-
Compelled speech it is then?
So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?
Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.
Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.
They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.
-
This post did not contain any content.
When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to say bigoted shit
-
Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.
They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.
It slightly saves my sanity. Only slightly though.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hey government how’s it going
…
…
Jesus fucking christ
-
This post did not contain any content.
I know the point of this is probably just intimidation but 35 companies? Are there 35 social networks that moderate content? Why is Apple included? Is there some conspiracy theory that they’re censoring conservative App Store reviews?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Good thing we have a fair and balanced FTC? Right?
Lets see:
We have 2 Democrats 2 Republicans, and...
oh... one vacant seat
(also, one of the Democrats was appointed in 2018, we all know who was president then)
-
This post did not contain any content.
And by "free speech", we mean you have to publish what we tell you.
-
Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.
They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.
For them, them being able to be hypocrites is a "cool thing"
-
This post did not contain any content.
If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.
-
And by "free speech", we mean you have to publish what we tell you.
Never stops being true.
-
If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.
It should be interesting to see how it plays out, indeed.
I don't expect the US will entirely ban all forms of content moderation. I wouldn't be surprised if the US moved more in the direction of the EU Digital Services Act: required transparency on recommendation algorithms and some sort of NGO trusted flagger system.
Also, similar (but opposite) to Splinternet: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels_effect
-
When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to say bigoted shit
And post as much disinformation as they want without "censorship".
-
This post did not contain any content.
Tomorrow: Trump installs loyalist with zero qualifications as head of FCC.
-
If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.
I doubt it. They could just sensor based on location.
-
If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.
It's not censorship, it's "censorship". You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.
