Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. FTC investigates “tech censorship,” says it’s un-American and may be illegal

FTC investigates “tech censorship,” says it’s un-American and may be illegal

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
32 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Compelled speech it is then?

    So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?

    Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.

    tropicaldingdong@lemmy.worldT R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Defunded in 3…2…

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A [email protected]

        Compelled speech it is then?

        So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?

        Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.

        tropicaldingdong@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        tropicaldingdong@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.

        They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.

        A Z 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          sharkfucker420@lemmy.mlS This user is from outside of this forum
          sharkfucker420@lemmy.mlS This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to say bigoted shit

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tropicaldingdong@lemmy.worldT [email protected]

            Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.

            They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            It slightly saves my sanity. Only slightly though.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Hey government how’s it going

              …

              …

              Jesus fucking christ

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                I know the point of this is probably just intimidation but 35 companies? Are there 35 social networks that moderate content? Why is Apple included? Is there some conspiracy theory that they’re censoring conservative App Store reviews?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Good thing we have a fair and balanced FTC? Right?

                  Lets see:

                  We have 2 Democrats 2 Republicans, and...

                  oh... one vacant seat 👀

                  (also, one of the Democrats was appointed in 2018, we all know who was president then)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                    beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    And by "free speech", we mean you have to publish what we tell you.

                    sturgist@lemmy.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tropicaldingdong@lemmy.worldT [email protected]

                      Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.

                      They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.

                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      For them, them being able to be hypocrites is a "cool thing"

                      theneverfox@pawb.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splinternet

                        T S D 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB [email protected]

                          And by "free speech", we mean you have to publish what we tell you.

                          sturgist@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sturgist@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Never stops being true.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tal@lemmy.todayT [email protected]

                            If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splinternet

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            It should be interesting to see how it plays out, indeed.

                            I don't expect the US will entirely ban all forms of content moderation. I wouldn't be surprised if the US moved more in the direction of the EU Digital Services Act: required transparency on recommendation algorithms and some sort of NGO trusted flagger system.

                            Also, similar (but opposite) to Splinternet: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels_effect

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sharkfucker420@lemmy.mlS [email protected]

                              When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to say bigoted shit

                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              And post as much disinformation as they want without "censorship".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                Tomorrow: Trump installs loyalist with zero qualifications as head of FCC.

                                S V 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • tal@lemmy.todayT [email protected]

                                  If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splinternet

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  I doubt it. They could just sensor based on location.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tal@lemmy.todayT [email protected]

                                    If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splinternet

                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    It's not censorship, it's "censorship". You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D [email protected]

                                      It's not censorship, it's "censorship". You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.

                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Generally speaking, when a much stronger party forces upon you a mechanism, it doesn't work in your favor. Whether they call it free speech (for bot campaigns too, while you get banned) or moderation (your opponent insults you in every comment, and they are fine, but you insult them once - you're banned).

                                      The super weirdest thing is that people again and again believe that the strong party belonging to "their" side will do things right this time in history.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A [email protected]

                                        Compelled speech it is then?

                                        So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?

                                        Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.

                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        Do as I say not as I do is power of no one stops you.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B [email protected]

                                          Tomorrow: Trump installs loyalist with zero qualifications as head of FCC.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          Yeah, I wonder how long until Elmo arrives to "make the FTC more efficient" lmao

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups