European police say KidFlix, "one of the largest pedophile platforms in the world," busted in joint operation.
-
it can hide in plain sight, and then when you dig into someones profile, it can lead to someone or a group discussing CSAM and beastility, not just CP. like a site similar to r/pics, or porn site.
I can definitely see how people could find it while looking for porn. I don't understand how people can do this stuff out in the open with no consequences .
-
"Clearly in their late teens," sure.
Obviously there's a difference with AI porn vs real, that's why I told you to search AI in the first place??? The convo isn't about AI porn, but AI porn uses images to seed their new images including CSAM
It's fucking AI, the face is actually like 3 days old because it is NOT A REAL PERSON'S FACE.
-
File-sharing and online chat seem like basic internet activities to me.
This ain't the early 2000s. The unwashed masses have found the internet, and it has been cleaned for them. 97% of the internet has no idea what Matrix channels even are.
-
...and most of the people who agree with that notion would also consider reading Lemmy to be "trawling dark waters" because it's not a major site run by a massive corporation actively working to maintain advertiser friendliness to maximize profits. Hell, Matrix is practically Lemmy-adjacent in terms of the tech.
Correct. And even then, there's vanishingly little CP on lemmy.
-
It's fucking AI, the face is actually like 3 days old because it is NOT A REAL PERSON'S FACE.
We aren't even arguing about this, you giant creep who ALWAYS HAS TO GO TO BAT FOR THIS TOPIC REPEATEDLY.
It's meant to LOOK LIKE a 14 yr old because it is SEEDED OFF 14 YR OLDS so it's indeed CHILD PORN that is EASILY ACCESSED ON GOOGLE per the original commenter claim that people have to be going to dark places to see this - NO, it's literally in nearly ALL AI TOP SEARCHES. And it indeed counts for LEGAL PURPOSES in MOST STATES as child porn even if drawn or created with AI
You're one of the people I am.talking about when I say Lemmy has a lot of creepy pedos on it FYI to all the readers, look at their history
-
"they knew some things and didn't know some things" isn't worth getting so worked up over. they knew the mere concept of sex being taboo negatively affected them and didn't want to make definitive statements about things they didn't research. believe it or not lemmy comments are not dissertations and most people just talk and don't bother researching every tangential topic just to make a point they want to make.
You're doing a lot of legwork to defend someone who fantasizes about and researches extensively children watching adults have sex, and then uses that research to justify the idea to other adults
-
We aren't even arguing about this, you giant creep who ALWAYS HAS TO GO TO BAT FOR THIS TOPIC REPEATEDLY.
It's meant to LOOK LIKE a 14 yr old because it is SEEDED OFF 14 YR OLDS so it's indeed CHILD PORN that is EASILY ACCESSED ON GOOGLE per the original commenter claim that people have to be going to dark places to see this - NO, it's literally in nearly ALL AI TOP SEARCHES. And it indeed counts for LEGAL PURPOSES in MOST STATES as child porn even if drawn or created with AI
You're one of the people I am.talking about when I say Lemmy has a lot of creepy pedos on it FYI to all the readers, look at their history
I'm offended by stupid-ass shit and feel compelled to call it out. Thinking AI-generated fake images is just as harmful as actual children getting abused is perhaps the most obvious definition of "stupid-ass shit" since the invention of stupid-ass shit.
-
You're doing a lot of legwork to defend someone who fantasizes about and researches extensively children watching adults have sex, and then uses that research to justify the idea to other adults
are you basing this on other comments by the same person? because I saw none of that in the comment you cited and this is starting to sound like either projection or some sort of trauma-led bad faith interpretation to be generous.
also fuck off with that legwork bullshit I'm just replying to your unhinged comments don't pretend like I'm putting in any effort here.
-
are you basing this on other comments by the same person? because I saw none of that in the comment you cited and this is starting to sound like either projection or some sort of trauma-led bad faith interpretation to be generous.
also fuck off with that legwork bullshit I'm just replying to your unhinged comments don't pretend like I'm putting in any effort here.
Gee, yet another month where Lemmy users go all out to protect creeps
-
I'm offended by stupid-ass shit and feel compelled to call it out. Thinking AI-generated fake images is just as harmful as actual children getting abused is perhaps the most obvious definition of "stupid-ass shit" since the invention of stupid-ass shit.
Yeah, sure. You're just extremely passionate about AI child porn, yet not passionate at all about things like outlawing child marriage. Creep.
-
Gee, yet another month where Lemmy users go all out to protect creeps
again, i know nothing about the person, I'm just responding to you. so far your entire tirade seems to be based on the word probably.
-
again, i know nothing about the person, I'm just responding to you. so far your entire tirade seems to be based on the word probably.
Great, thanks for your opinion. I don't care about it, but it's there.
-
Great, thanks for your opinion. I don't care about it, but it's there.
your comment doesn't follow but at least it's more hinged. have a nice weekend.
-
Yeah, sure. You're just extremely passionate about AI child porn, yet not passionate at all about things like outlawing child marriage. Creep.
No one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.
Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?
-
No one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.
Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?
Way to miss both of my points. Read it again.
-
your comment doesn't follow but at least it's more hinged. have a nice weekend.
Again, your opinion is so bad it's a compliment to be against you
-
Way to miss both of my points. Read it again.
Way to not answer the question.
-
Again, your opinion is so bad it's a compliment to be against you
my only opinion here was maybe don't lose your shit over a simple word. I think it's pretty solid.
-
I can definitely see how people could find it while looking for porn. I don't understand how people can do this stuff out in the open with no consequences .
yea its often hidden too well to be easily found out and authorities might want to gather evidence so they let it accumulate then they pounce. one of the sites was mostly inneundos and talking about commiting it, but not actually distributing the material, they co-opt certain images to pervert it.
-
Honestly, if the existing victims have to deal with a few more people masturbating to the existing video material and in exchange it leads to fewer future victims it might be worth the trade-off but it is certainly not an easy choice to make.
That would be acceptable, but that’s unfortunately not what’s happening. Like I said: due to the majority of the files being hosted on file sharing platforms of the normal web, it’s way more effective to let them be deleted by those platforms.
Some investigative journalist tried this, and documented the frustration among the users of child porn websites, to reload all the GBs/TBs of material, so that they rather quitted and shut down their sites, than going the extra mile
