European police say KidFlix, "one of the largest pedophile platforms in the world," busted in joint operation.
-
No judge would authorise a honeypot that runs for multiple years, hosting original child abuse material meaning that children are actively being abused to produce content for it. That would be an unspeakable atrocity. A few years ago the Australian police seized a similar website and ran it for a matter of weeks to gather intelligence and even that was considered too far for many.
wrote 4 days ago last edited by"That would be an unspeakable atrocity", yet there is contradiction in the final sentence. The issue is, what evidence is there to prove such thing operation actually works, as my last point implied - what stops the government from abusing this sort of operation. With "covert" operations like this the outcome can be catastrophic for everyone.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 4 days ago last edited by
The name of it sounds like a streaming service for children's movies and TV shows. Like, Netflix for kids.
In the past 5 years I have seen at least 3 deepweb social communities that started out normally, with a lot of people talking shit and enjoying anonymous free speech. Then I log in a couple weeks or months later to find CP being posted and no mods doing anything to stop it. In all those cases, I reported the site to the FBI anonymously and erased my login from my password manager. -
During the investigation, Europol’s analysts from the European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) provided intensive operational support to national authorities by analysing thousands of videos.
I don't know how you can do this job and not get sick because looking away is not an option
wrote 4 days ago last edited byI'm sure many of them numb themselves to it, and pretend it isn't real in order to do the job. Then unfortunately, I'm sure some of them get addicted themselves.
Similar to undercover cops who do drugs while undercover, then get addicted to the drugs.
-
During the investigation, Europol’s analysts from the European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) provided intensive operational support to national authorities by analysing thousands of videos.
I don't know how you can do this job and not get sick because looking away is not an option
wrote 4 days ago last edited byThis kind of shit is why i noped out of the digital forensics field. I would have killed myself if I had to see that shit everyday.
-
it can hide in plain sight, and then when you dig into someones profile, it can lead to someone or a group discussing CSAM and beastility, not just CP. like a site similar to r/pics, or porn site.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byI can definitely see how people could find it while looking for porn. I don't understand how people can do this stuff out in the open with no consequences .
-
"Clearly in their late teens," sure.
Obviously there's a difference with AI porn vs real, that's why I told you to search AI in the first place??? The convo isn't about AI porn, but AI porn uses images to seed their new images including CSAM
wrote 4 days ago last edited byIt's fucking AI, the face is actually like 3 days old because it is NOT A REAL PERSON'S FACE.
-
wrote 4 days ago last edited by
This ain't the early 2000s. The unwashed masses have found the internet, and it has been cleaned for them. 97% of the internet has no idea what Matrix channels even are.
-
...and most of the people who agree with that notion would also consider reading Lemmy to be "trawling dark waters" because it's not a major site run by a massive corporation actively working to maintain advertiser friendliness to maximize profits. Hell, Matrix is practically Lemmy-adjacent in terms of the tech.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byCorrect. And even then, there's vanishingly little CP on lemmy.
-
It's fucking AI, the face is actually like 3 days old because it is NOT A REAL PERSON'S FACE.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byWe aren't even arguing about this, you giant creep who ALWAYS HAS TO GO TO BAT FOR THIS TOPIC REPEATEDLY.
It's meant to LOOK LIKE a 14 yr old because it is SEEDED OFF 14 YR OLDS so it's indeed CHILD PORN that is EASILY ACCESSED ON GOOGLE per the original commenter claim that people have to be going to dark places to see this - NO, it's literally in nearly ALL AI TOP SEARCHES. And it indeed counts for LEGAL PURPOSES in MOST STATES as child porn even if drawn or created with AI
You're one of the people I am.talking about when I say Lemmy has a lot of creepy pedos on it FYI to all the readers, look at their history
-
"they knew some things and didn't know some things" isn't worth getting so worked up over. they knew the mere concept of sex being taboo negatively affected them and didn't want to make definitive statements about things they didn't research. believe it or not lemmy comments are not dissertations and most people just talk and don't bother researching every tangential topic just to make a point they want to make.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byYou're doing a lot of legwork to defend someone who fantasizes about and researches extensively children watching adults have sex, and then uses that research to justify the idea to other adults
-
We aren't even arguing about this, you giant creep who ALWAYS HAS TO GO TO BAT FOR THIS TOPIC REPEATEDLY.
It's meant to LOOK LIKE a 14 yr old because it is SEEDED OFF 14 YR OLDS so it's indeed CHILD PORN that is EASILY ACCESSED ON GOOGLE per the original commenter claim that people have to be going to dark places to see this - NO, it's literally in nearly ALL AI TOP SEARCHES. And it indeed counts for LEGAL PURPOSES in MOST STATES as child porn even if drawn or created with AI
You're one of the people I am.talking about when I say Lemmy has a lot of creepy pedos on it FYI to all the readers, look at their history
wrote 4 days ago last edited byI'm offended by stupid-ass shit and feel compelled to call it out. Thinking AI-generated fake images is just as harmful as actual children getting abused is perhaps the most obvious definition of "stupid-ass shit" since the invention of stupid-ass shit.
-
You're doing a lot of legwork to defend someone who fantasizes about and researches extensively children watching adults have sex, and then uses that research to justify the idea to other adults
wrote 4 days ago last edited byare you basing this on other comments by the same person? because I saw none of that in the comment you cited and this is starting to sound like either projection or some sort of trauma-led bad faith interpretation to be generous.
also fuck off with that legwork bullshit I'm just replying to your unhinged comments don't pretend like I'm putting in any effort here.
-
are you basing this on other comments by the same person? because I saw none of that in the comment you cited and this is starting to sound like either projection or some sort of trauma-led bad faith interpretation to be generous.
also fuck off with that legwork bullshit I'm just replying to your unhinged comments don't pretend like I'm putting in any effort here.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byGee, yet another month where Lemmy users go all out to protect creeps
-
I'm offended by stupid-ass shit and feel compelled to call it out. Thinking AI-generated fake images is just as harmful as actual children getting abused is perhaps the most obvious definition of "stupid-ass shit" since the invention of stupid-ass shit.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byYeah, sure. You're just extremely passionate about AI child porn, yet not passionate at all about things like outlawing child marriage. Creep.
-
Gee, yet another month where Lemmy users go all out to protect creeps
wrote 4 days ago last edited byagain, i know nothing about the person, I'm just responding to you. so far your entire tirade seems to be based on the word probably.
-
again, i know nothing about the person, I'm just responding to you. so far your entire tirade seems to be based on the word probably.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byGreat, thanks for your opinion. I don't care about it, but it's there.
-
Great, thanks for your opinion. I don't care about it, but it's there.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byyour comment doesn't follow but at least it's more hinged. have a nice weekend.
-
Yeah, sure. You're just extremely passionate about AI child porn, yet not passionate at all about things like outlawing child marriage. Creep.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byNo one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.
Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?
-
No one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.
Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?
wrote 4 days ago last edited byWay to miss both of my points. Read it again.
-
your comment doesn't follow but at least it's more hinged. have a nice weekend.
wrote 4 days ago last edited byAgain, your opinion is so bad it's a compliment to be against you