Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Greentext
  3. Anon breaks up

Anon breaks up

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Greentext
greentext
196 Posts 90 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    "She's probably right." "Dude was probably violent." "Easier to give up your guns than fight this in court" "Just give up your guns!"

    Lmao wowww lemmy. Nobody here likes due process?

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #187

    Due process is dead in America, homie

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • D [email protected]

      In 2015 I'd agree.

      In 2025? Nah, look at what's happening around the US.

      Dems are losing votes because of the guns issue, drop the gun issue, along with promoting a progressive platform and that's easily winning elections.

      jerkface@lemmy.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jerkface@lemmy.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #188

      In 2025? Nah, look at what’s happening around the US.

      Record gun deaths?

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jerkface@lemmy.caJ [email protected]

        In 2025? Nah, look at what’s happening around the US.

        Record gun deaths?

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #189

        fascism

        You really think you can trust the police?

        ACAB

        The only way out of this is self-defence militias, but unfortunately, people left-of-center have already been disarming themselves while the far-right have been stocking up on ammunition, all thanks to the anti-gun rhetoric.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D [email protected]

          I never said that Anon made any death threat and the concern you are raising is covered in the rest of my comment.

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #190

          I mean if someone makes death threats

          This is a clear suggestion that Anon was making death threats. Don't be a liar

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T [email protected]

            Kinda. It’s also a remnant of the old west. Guns were freedom, protection, power, etc.

            It would be much more effective to curb crime by meeting everyone’s basic needs than giving everyone a gun.

            But dumb Americans don’t know any other way. They are just too self-centered and absorbed to think about anyone else.

            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #191

            It would be much more effective to curb crime by meeting everyone’s basic needs than giving everyone a gun.

            If crime is reduced by meeting everyone's needs, then it shouldn't matter whether people have guns or not. So let's have strong social safety nets and quit pissing people off by taking away their hobbies and property.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D [email protected]

              I mean... isn't that what is NRA is for?

              Or... do they only defend rich white people's gun rights? 🤔

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #192

              The second

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M [email protected]

                I mean if someone makes death threats

                This is a clear suggestion that Anon was making death threats. Don't be a liar

                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by [email protected]
                #193

                I find if interesting that you've read that first paragraph and interpreted it as a suggestion of one thing, then read the paragraph immediately below it that could have suggested the opposite, and not only completely ignore that second paragraph, but also fail to realize that they were hypothetical situations to explain a point. Everyone understood that but you.

                Sure, force a specific interpretation of my words that you've specifically cherry picked to make you sound right so you can feel better about yourself. It ain't gonna be true and we'll both know that whether you like it or not, but judging from the fact that you just came back 4 days later for this, I don't think this fact will bother you. This is a 4 day old thread and nobody is left here to witness the level of mental gymnastics you're capable of anyway. Go ahead, treat yourself.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • liz@midwest.socialL [email protected]

                  I like guns.

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #194

                  but that's bc you are a bad person.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D [email protected]

                    I find if interesting that you've read that first paragraph and interpreted it as a suggestion of one thing, then read the paragraph immediately below it that could have suggested the opposite, and not only completely ignore that second paragraph, but also fail to realize that they were hypothetical situations to explain a point. Everyone understood that but you.

                    Sure, force a specific interpretation of my words that you've specifically cherry picked to make you sound right so you can feel better about yourself. It ain't gonna be true and we'll both know that whether you like it or not, but judging from the fact that you just came back 4 days later for this, I don't think this fact will bother you. This is a 4 day old thread and nobody is left here to witness the level of mental gymnastics you're capable of anyway. Go ahead, treat yourself.

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #195

                    then read the paragraph immediately below it that could have suggested the opposite,

                    Your second paragraph did not suggest the opposite

                    You claim you were deliberately being vague, then get mad at someone allegedly misinterpreting what you said? The solution is to not be vague, not to gaslight people by claiming you didn't say something you absolutely did. Grow up.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]

                      then read the paragraph immediately below it that could have suggested the opposite,

                      Your second paragraph did not suggest the opposite

                      You claim you were deliberately being vague, then get mad at someone allegedly misinterpreting what you said? The solution is to not be vague, not to gaslight people by claiming you didn't say something you absolutely did. Grow up.

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #196

                      1- The second paragraph could very well be interpreted as suggesting that hypothetical threat allegations being fraudulent and therefore suggest the opposite. This is downright bad faith from your part.

                      2- I'm being mad at someone calling me a "liar" and trying to continue to force their own erroneous interpretation of my own words after I immediately clarified it for them and who keeps doubling down on it even after further explanation.

                      3- You call it "vague" and yet still claim that I "absolutely did" mean what you think I meant, once again giving yourself a completely unwarranted benefit of the doubt on the matter against the now overwhelming evidence.

                      4- Everyone else interpreted it correctly except you.

                      5- Why the fuck would I even accuse Anon of making death threats when they were never mentioned in the article to begin with? It is much telling that this is where your mind went immediately.

                      6- You came here looking for something to get angry about and thought you found it by diagonally reading through my comment and jumped to conclusions. Now that I called you out on it you decided that it had to be my fault instead and are going further down the rabbit hole of inventing all sorts of malicious intents from my part.

                      7- You don't have to admit it to me, only yourself. Because you will be blocked as soon as I have sent this. You will be the first one I've ever blocked on Lemmy over a comment argument too. I thought I had left this crap behind me when I dumped Reddit years ago but some seem to have followed. Which by the way also refutes your new unsubstantiated accusation of having made my original "deliberately vague" as if I had created some sort of trap to attract people like you. You can now rest assured that I don't want people like you in my life.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups