Here's what would happen if Canada joined the European Union
-
W [email protected] shared this topic
-
-
Well, we'd have to redraw a bunch of maps, so at least it'd one up the dumb Gulf of Mexico distraction.
This seems pretty silly. There are tons of intermediary states Canada could reach without the weird torturing of geography. As the linked piece acknowledges way at the bottom, incidentally.
-
-
Agreed.
The idea of Vancouver being in the EU is crazy since it's halfway around the world.
Although there is French Polynesia and other overseas territories that are part of the EU so I guess it's not that weird.
-
Imagine if the United States of America had a state that wasn't part of America. It would be completely crazy! How could it ever make sense?
I mean, picture it: some place, say somewhere in the Pacific Ocean, maybe some independent Polynesian country, just gets made into a state. We wouldn't be the United States of America anymore!
-
-
The European Union is just a name, a label, I don't think it would too much of a drama to change the name for something more inclusive, even if we do not change the name, who cares anyway? There are already some overseas territories in South America that are part of the EU like someone else pointed.
-
Why would we? The european Union already has existing territory in Latein america, so a north American Country joining aint ruled Out.
*technically, thanks to France, we already have a Union, where the sun never sets. If it we're Not for the fact, that those other territories are Not recognized as being an integral territory by France , therefore Not being within EU jurisdiction.
I guess, If a certain orange would try to coerce France into selling those territories, this opinion of france would change fast -
Is there anything in EU regulations that mandates technical standards that would be difficult to replace on a Canada-wide scale, such as 220V/50Hz mains electricity, RF spectrum, TV broadcasting formats and such? How much of a mess would it make to split these into “EU West” and “EU East”, and to balance that with there being a notional single market (“what do you mean the TV I bought in Toronto won’t work in Prague?”)
-
Canada and Mexico should form the American Union and immediately pincer the United States, economically and literally.
-
To join the European Union the country must be located in Europe. I don't think Canada will fill up this criteria.
-
Is it still a pincer is it's ABAB? Don't forget Alaska.
-
French Guyana would like a word! Maybe we should just join an already existing European country.
-
shouldnt eu then be called atlantic union or something
-
“I’m a little bit dismayed that this unrealistic debate about EU membership kind of distracts from the things that could really be done to intensify the relationship,” said Hurrelmann. “How could we try to speed up processes of regulatory alignment under CETA? How could we encourage European investment in Canada in areas such as critical raw materials?… Those, I think, are the kinds of debates for which there’s really a lot of potential. And the Canada-EU economic relationship can definitely become closer and can be intensified, and that would be beneficial for both sides, but not through Canada’s membership in the EU.”
Hmm. I'm not actually sure that's a problem. Even if we say we want to, the first steps are doing things like aligning regulations and setting up free movement, like this suggests.
-
They should annex Mexico too and call it the North American - European Union. The NAEU.
Can you imagine the trading asset Mexico could mean for the European Union? Plus, cracking down on drug trafficking across the Atlantic would be easier.
-
They should call the new deal the MexiCana or something. Good for all 3 languages.
-
Maybe like North Atlantic Treaty
Organizationunion -
No, that’s scissors
