Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. 5 tomatoes

5 tomatoes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
225 Posts 132 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ickplant@lemmy.worldI [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #140

    I use both in my wood shop. Sometimes it's easier to lay things out in metric or divide numbers, but other times it's easier to remember an imperial number to go make a cut.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • ickplant@lemmy.worldI [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
      merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #141

      My 2 main annoyances with the metric system:

      First: The SI unit for mass is the kilogram. That's fucking stupid. A kilogram is 1000 grams, the base unit for something can't be "1000 of this other thing". Because the kilogram is the SI unit for mass, that means that a gram is, by definition, 1/1000th of a kilogram. The stupidity, it burns!

      The second one isn't really an issue with the metric system, it's more when people are almost using the metric system then fuck it up, like the "Watt Hour" for measuring energy use. You know, there's already a way of measuring energy use: the "Watt Second", also known as "The Joule"

      E F 2 Replies Last reply
      9
      • T [email protected]

        I think one useful comparison would be to convert their measurement of the speed of light to our measurement and vice versa. They will use different units of distance and time, but the values themselves will be proportional unless they live in a black hole.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #142

        That could work for velocities, but any measure of distance is based on our notion of time, like "light year" (the distance light can travel in one rotation of the Earth around the sun), which is relative.

        Even an AU is the distance from Earth to our sun.

        To be fair, we don't really have another point of reference with which to measure stuff.

        A good way to portray distance could be a blip the length of time it would take light to travel that far. Like an RF signal that lasts as long as it would take for light up travel from one edge of an object to the other edge of the object.

        ... It's a difficult problem to try to solve even as a mental exercise.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P [email protected]

          Base 12 is easily divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12

          5,280 ft in a mile is fucking nonsense though

          chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
          chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #143

          Because there's a extra system of measurement change hiding in the middle. The Inches, Feet and Yards system (with the familiar 12:1 and 3:1 ratios we know and love), and Rods, Chains, Furlongs and Miles system. Their conversation rates are generally "nice", with ratios of 4 rods : 1 chain, 10 chains : 1 furlong, and 8 furlongs : 1 mile.

          So where do we get 5,280 with prime factors of 2^5, 3, 5 and 11? Because a chain is 22 yards long. Why? Because somewhere along the line, inches, feet and yards went to a smaller standard, and the nice round 5 yards per rods became 5 and 1/2 yards per rod. Instead of a mile containing 4,800 feet (with quarters, twelfths and hundredths of miles all being nice round numbers of feet), it contained an extra 480 feet that were 1/11th smaller than the old feet.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • M [email protected]

            All units of measure are abstract.

            I like metric because it's structured around an abstract amount. Even something like Celsius is pretty abstract, because the freezing and boiling point of water changes depending on the atmospheric pressure. The measure of a second? Why is a second, 1 second long? Why is it 1/60th of 1/60th of 1/24th of a day?
            There's other stuff based on seconds too, like Hertz, which is literally "cycles per second"

            I like to think about how abstract these things are, because if we were to ever try to communicate with a truly alien race, we couldn't really use numbers, because their base numbering system would be different than ours, their symbols for numbers would be different, their entire understanding of math and how to calculate stuff could be wildly different, possibly because they understand things we do not. We couldn't even say to them to communicate on a specific frequency of EM, because that frequency is based on Hertz, which is based on seconds, which is based on ????? IDFK (neither would they).
            We base everything we know on the world around us, and that's entirely unique to earth. We make so many assumptions about how things are because we've only ever experienced life on this planet.

            The only thing that kind of makes sense is how many days of the year there are, because it's based on solid science about our solar system. It's still unique to earth, but at least it makes sense on a larger scale. Everything else? Who the hell knows. Why is a meter as long as it is? Who defined this? Why? What abstract Earth-based thing was this based on that other societies of individuals would have no point of reference to relate to?

            It's wild we've made it this far, to be honest.

            Anyways, I kind of got sidetracked... I guess all I'm really trying to say is that metric makes more sense than whatever the USA is doing. Even if it's just as abstract in its conception.

            W This user is from outside of this forum
            W This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #144

            their base numbering system would be different than ours, their symbols for numbers would be different, their entire understanding of math and how to calculate stuff could be wildly different

            The neat thing about math is it’s built upon universal truths that exist independently of how you describe them. 1+1=2 regardless of how you represent those numbers. Even among humans we have plenty of different ways of describing numbers.

            Also, the best thing about science is that physics works the way it does regardless of how you describe it. An atom of hydrogen will always have the same spectral peaks, regardless of what units you describe those peaks in.

            It’s these kinds of things we consider when trying to communicate with aliens. Take a look at:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_plaque

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_Golden_Record

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_message

            These messages will probably never be received, even if there is intelligent life out there. But if something intelligent does find these messages, they will probably determine they are artificial, and hopefully manage to decode some of it.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • T [email protected]

              They're right. Altitude sickness is absolutely real. I live in CT pretty close to sea level. I hiked the flatirons in Boulder and puked my guts out when I came back down.

              captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
              captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #145

              The first time I ever took a non-pressurized aircraft to 10,000 feet was an interesting experience. I noticed myself breathing...not heavier, that feels like the wrong word, because I had the opposite problem to "heavy." I needed to breathe noticeably deeper and faster just sitting still at the controls of the plane doing maybe slightly more work than typing this sentence. Somebody from a lower area going up to Denver (about half the altitude I flew to that day) to play a sport has an elevated chance of Not A Good Day.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • K [email protected]

                The only positive thing I see about imperial is that things are easily divisible by 3 and 6, but that's about it. Then again, if doing the same with metric, you're usually fine rounding to the nearest millimetre, and if that isn't accurate enough, it's probably not supposed to be done by hand anyway.

                captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #146

                I've banged on about this at length before. I prefer woodworking in inches because I have to divide by 3 and 4 a lot more often than divide by 5. It turns out that the fractional inch system evolved alongside woodworking for a very long time and it solves a lot of the problems woodworkers actually face...as long as you're not a European scraping in the dirt for something to feel superior about.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #147

                  Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia:

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg

                  Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard".

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • merc@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

                    My 2 main annoyances with the metric system:

                    First: The SI unit for mass is the kilogram. That's fucking stupid. A kilogram is 1000 grams, the base unit for something can't be "1000 of this other thing". Because the kilogram is the SI unit for mass, that means that a gram is, by definition, 1/1000th of a kilogram. The stupidity, it burns!

                    The second one isn't really an issue with the metric system, it's more when people are almost using the metric system then fuck it up, like the "Watt Hour" for measuring energy use. You know, there's already a way of measuring energy use: the "Watt Second", also known as "The Joule"

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #148

                    it's more when people are almost using the metric system then fuck it up, like the "Watt Hour" for measuring energy use.

                    Energy is just so important to physics and engineering that it will be measured in whatever unit is most convenient to convert in that particular context: joules as the SI unit, watt hours for electricity usage, calories for certain types of heat or food energy calculations, electron volts in particle physics, equivalent tonnes of TNT for explosion energy, things like that.

                    merc@sh.itjust.worksM 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC [email protected]

                      The first time I ever took a non-pressurized aircraft to 10,000 feet was an interesting experience. I noticed myself breathing...not heavier, that feels like the wrong word, because I had the opposite problem to "heavy." I needed to breathe noticeably deeper and faster just sitting still at the controls of the plane doing maybe slightly more work than typing this sentence. Somebody from a lower area going up to Denver (about half the altitude I flew to that day) to play a sport has an elevated chance of Not A Good Day.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #149

                      You'd think the Rockies would have a better record but they somehow still consistently suck

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N [email protected]

                        Forma me it's the yard. It's so close to the meter its ridiculous. I just ignore the difference an treat as the same. One yard = 0.9144 meters

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #150

                        A yard is about 1.4 litres in my book, or 2.1/2 pints - imperial pints mind, not US ones.
                        I'm not ignoring away that 20% difference; it's bad enough with all the fucking "pint to brim" glasses these days.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ickplant@lemmy.worldI [email protected]
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #151

                          If you want to convert between imperial units, going straight from feet to miles is impractical. You'd be better off knowing the chart of survey units, and they're all small numbers so they're easy to remember.

                          12 inches in a foot

                          3 feet in a yard

                          22 yards in a chain

                          10 chains in a furlong

                          8 furlongs in a mile

                          Of course, i know this because I do 3d art in blender and refuse to set it to metric.

                          N M R C 4 Replies Last reply
                          22
                          • P [email protected]

                            Base 12 is easily divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12

                            5,280 ft in a mile is fucking nonsense though

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #152

                            I think a mile is specified in terms of 'chains' not really feet or yards.
                            Feet and yards are meant for measuring smaller stuff, like the size of a foot, or a courtyard.

                            The 'chain' was a specific surveyors tool for measuring larger land areas. I imagine defined to be a length of physical chain practically manageable by the surveyor - probably pre-dating optical / triangulation methods before lenses got cheap.

                            I think an acre was then defined as 10 square chains or something.

                            But go back in time far enough and different jurisdictions have different lengths of standard chain, so different miles and acres derived from it. But it doesn't really matter because if you were buying land in Scotland, then you'd probably want to use a Scottish surveyor and his big long chain.

                            The nautical mile is then a whole other kettle of fish.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • W [email protected]

                              their base numbering system would be different than ours, their symbols for numbers would be different, their entire understanding of math and how to calculate stuff could be wildly different

                              The neat thing about math is it’s built upon universal truths that exist independently of how you describe them. 1+1=2 regardless of how you represent those numbers. Even among humans we have plenty of different ways of describing numbers.

                              Also, the best thing about science is that physics works the way it does regardless of how you describe it. An atom of hydrogen will always have the same spectral peaks, regardless of what units you describe those peaks in.

                              It’s these kinds of things we consider when trying to communicate with aliens. Take a look at:

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_plaque

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_Golden_Record

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_message

                              These messages will probably never be received, even if there is intelligent life out there. But if something intelligent does find these messages, they will probably determine they are artificial, and hopefully manage to decode some of it.

                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #153

                              See, this is all fascinating for me. I love this stuff.

                              It's also a good exercise in recognizing the assumptions we make every day. I'm trying to get to a point where I can articulate my thoughts and I don't have to struggle through the curse of knowledge.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC [email protected]

                                I've banged on about this at length before. I prefer woodworking in inches because I have to divide by 3 and 4 a lot more often than divide by 5. It turns out that the fractional inch system evolved alongside woodworking for a very long time and it solves a lot of the problems woodworkers actually face...as long as you're not a European scraping in the dirt for something to feel superior about.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #154

                                I do woodworking a bit too, but I normally just do the slanty ruler/tape trick to divide any straight parallel face into n equal lengths.
                                I hate all forms of mental arithmetic; I also avoid measuring as much as possible too. Maybe that's why everything i make is so shit.

                                I guess if you're mass producing things you can't just manually mark off each and every part though - but even then I'd probably want to work to a template rather than to measure.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G [email protected]

                                  If you want to convert between imperial units, going straight from feet to miles is impractical. You'd be better off knowing the chart of survey units, and they're all small numbers so they're easy to remember.

                                  12 inches in a foot

                                  3 feet in a yard

                                  22 yards in a chain

                                  10 chains in a furlong

                                  8 furlongs in a mile

                                  Of course, i know this because I do 3d art in blender and refuse to set it to metric.

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #155

                                  Of course, i know this because I do 3d art in blender and refuse to set it to metric.

                                  You monster.

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  9
                                  • C [email protected]

                                    “In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1 percent of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Whereas in the American system, the answer to ‘How much energy does it take to boil a room-temperature gallon of water?’ is ‘Go fuck yourself,’ because you can’t directly relate any of those quantities.”
                                    ― Josh Bazell, Wild Thing

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #156

                                    I remember reading this quote a few years ago (probably Reddit), but I don't remember if attribution was given. Kudos to you CAVOK.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • E [email protected]

                                      it's more when people are almost using the metric system then fuck it up, like the "Watt Hour" for measuring energy use.

                                      Energy is just so important to physics and engineering that it will be measured in whatever unit is most convenient to convert in that particular context: joules as the SI unit, watt hours for electricity usage, calories for certain types of heat or food energy calculations, electron volts in particle physics, equivalent tonnes of TNT for explosion energy, things like that.

                                      merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #157

                                      I don't believe that "watt hours" are more convenient than joules, especially when they're not just watt hours but kilowatt hours or megawatt hours. At that point just use megajoules or gigajoules.

                                      I can understand things like eV where the scale is so different that you'd have to constantly use tiny and unusual prefixes. But, for most other things like calories, it's just tradition rather than a well thought out reason.

                                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • G [email protected]

                                        If you want to convert between imperial units, going straight from feet to miles is impractical. You'd be better off knowing the chart of survey units, and they're all small numbers so they're easy to remember.

                                        12 inches in a foot

                                        3 feet in a yard

                                        22 yards in a chain

                                        10 chains in a furlong

                                        8 furlongs in a mile

                                        Of course, i know this because I do 3d art in blender and refuse to set it to metric.

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #158

                                        Remembering 12, 3, 22, 10 and 8 does indeed sound way easier than remembering 1000.

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        18
                                        • M [email protected]

                                          Remembering 12, 3, 22, 10 and 8 does indeed sound way easier than remembering 1000.

                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #159

                                          I know right? it's such an intuitive system with a convenient unit for every scale you might want to work with.

                                          E Z 2 Replies Last reply
                                          7
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups