Why I am not impressed by A.I.
-
-
Uh, no, that is not common parlance. If any human tells you that strawberry has two r's, they are also wrong.
-
-
-
-
-
-
This but actually. Don't use an LLM to do things LLMs are known to not be good at. As tools various companies would do good to list out specifically what they're not good at to eliminate requiring background knowledge before even using them, not unlike needing to know that one corner of those old iPhones was an antenna and to not bridge it.
-
So can web MD. We didn't need AI for that. Googling symptoms is a great way to just be dehydrated and suddenly think you're in kidney failure.
-
Still, it’s kinda insane how two years ago we didn’t imagine we would be instructing programs like “be helpful but avoid sensitive topics”.
That was definitely a big step in AI.
-
-
Uh oh, you’ve blown your cover, robot sir.
-
I think there's a fundamental difference between someone saying "you're holding your phone wrong, of course you're not getting a signal" to millions of people and someone saying "LLMs aren't good at that task you're asking it to perform, but they are good for XYZ."
If someone is using a hammer to cut down a tree, they're going to have a bad time. A hammer is not a useful tool for that job.
-
-
From a linguistic perspective, this is why I am impressed by (or at least, astonished by) LLMs!
-
-
I can already see it...
Ad:
CAN YOU SOLVE THIS IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLE THAT AI CAN'T SOLVE?!With OP's image. And then it will have the following once you solve it: "congratz, send us your personal details and you'll be added to the hall of fame at CERN Headquarters"
-
-
-
There's also a "r" in the first half of the word, "straw", so it was completely skipping over that r and just focusing on the r's in the word "berry"
