The Cybertruck Appears to Be More Deadly Than the Infamous Ford Pinto, According to a New Analysis
-
If you read the article is was specifically died by fire. Not any other cause of death.
-
^(^^s^^o^^r^^r^^y^ ^d^^r^^o^^p^^p^^e^^d^ ^/^^s^^)^
-
But it is so financially efficient! It isn't wasting money on safety.
-
Safety belts are a waste of precious money!
-
He is like a child who is still rebelling against his parents who made him go to bed early too many times.
-
Wish I could find data on all fatalities/100,000
-
Top of the line in utility sports.
Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts.
-
You mean he drew the design with a crayon?
-
Lol. You're getting your wish. They basically would be in the red if it weren't for some credits and Bitcoin they sold.
-
Most US trucks look fucking stupid. In my honest opinion.
-
No shit, it's literally just a big bullet. A wrecking ball on wheels.
-
Right but the specific issue with the Pinto was that it would explode into flames on a rear impact, so this is the appropriate metric.
Like deaths from other accidents would skew the numbers anyway becausd 70s cars were death traps compared to today, but even in that context, the Pinto's explosions were alarming.
Beating it on that isolated metric is a very special kind of achievement.
-
Who needs satire when you have reality?
-
But at least its bulletproof!
-
I was thinking “What’s that red stu—oh…” Yikes.
-
Are you telling me that 35,000 vehicles is not a sufficient sample size to assess safety? Are you for real?
-
-
The only thing that makes the cyberfuck safe is it's pricetag and it's virgin protector looks
-
To bb guns
-
