Censorship
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Which is exactly what happened when things started growing quickly due to the first Reddit exodus. OP should try and set up their own instance without any filtering and if it gains enough users and attention they'll see what full openness gets them. Have to remember, sometimes censorship doesn't mean you're being repressed, it just means most people don't care for or are ignoring your viewpoint.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So you got downvoted for a bunch of really shitty conservative political takes on the Canadian instance, and you're going to call it "censorship"?
Grow up.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You guys who are guessing at what behavior this guy is describing as "censorship," and basing your advice to him on your guess, need to learn to read the modlog.
@OP, not every instance is like that. lemmy.ml is notorious for censoring discussion as a way of the moderator picking a "correct" point of view and enforcing it. It's weird. Don't go to lemmy.ml and you mostly won't have issues with it, although some individual political communities may tend to do it, depending. But it's not a feature of all of the fediverse. It's just sort of an unfortunate side effect of the way moderation is structured. Mostly, the culture here isn't like that, though. Mostly. Sometimes it is.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The entire fediverse is built on censorship of thought and opinion because no server is allowed to join the fediverse that allows posts criticizing transgenderism.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I have you tagged as a right wing Nutjob already and your account is only 1 week old, so I have a great idea on the kind of "censorship" you're talking about.
Your Nazi/Right-wing viewpoints simply aren't welcome here, that's not censorship. Censorship is the government telling you what you can and cannot say. Not businesses, not individuals, not instance admins and not the Fediverse at large.
If you want to spew or hangout with others who do spew xenophobic, transphobic, racist hateful trash, go back to X or even truth social, your shitty hateful "viewpoints" will be welcome there
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We didn't guess.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I do not see upvotes or downvotes. If there are lots of downvotes I will never see it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Again, not wanting to hear bullshit != censoring. You can just go ahead and make your own instance that flames transgender people just for existing, if that's your thing, but people might find you annoying and rude and might not want to hang out with you.
Would you consider me blocking you to be censorship, for example? And if not, why would it be different if an entire group blocks you?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nope, not even you guys are good to their eyes. When will you learn?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why is it always white people who only speak English that calls people racist?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There isn't really a single "fediverse" that decides what's "allowed". What your fediverse is depends on where your account is and who they're federated with. You're perfectly free to say whatever you want on your own instance and talk to the other people on instances willing to federate with you. The thing is, being mean to people who have done nothing to harm you tends to make you pretty unpopular and make people not want to interact with you, that's why instances that encourage that tend to not be federated with very many popular instances.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think your first sentence of reply has a mistake, maybe a word is missing, it is not clear. Or am I not understanding correctly?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do people have a right to disagree with you? When you comment on any subject or topic, whatever it might be, do others have right to not support what you believe in? No marriage or serious relationship can last with restrictions on personal thought. Successful marriages must have room for disagreements.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
?
OP has never been moderated themselves. They participated in a comments section about keyboards. Some of the comments about FUTO were deleted because it was deemed offtopic, even though it kind of seemed on topic to me. Then, there was a separate post about FUTO specifically, which also had some stuff deleted from it. So it doesn't seem like the issue was the on-topic-ness, after all. Maybe I missed something in my cursory glance over everything, but it definitely looked to me like the moderator was picking what point of view was "correct", and deleting comments that went too far in the opposite direction from that. OP asked, "Why is there so many censored posts about keyboard apps?" which sounds like a great question.
What did I miss? I could have missed something. What did you see that OP was talking about instead of that?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Federation = replication of content across multiple servers for the sake of preservation and accessibility.
It does not equate to freedom of speech or freedom from censorship.
If you want an instance that allows just about everything, I repeat: Start your own, nobody is stopping you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I am looking at the modlog and see nothing, what am I missing?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yep. I quite enjoyed how lemigrad and lemmy.ml used to be the forerunners of lemmy and then quickly got kicked to the back because nobody in their right mind wants to interact with tankies.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If we're talking on the phone and you start talking about stuff that I'm not interested in hearing, I'm allowed to hang up.
You can disagree all you want, that doesn't mean I'm required to listen to you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
(You guys who are (guessing at what behavior this guy is describing as “censorship,” and basing your advice to him on your guess), need to learn to read the modlog.)
You guys need to learn to read the modlog.
You guys who are guessing at what behavior etc, need to learn to read the modlog.
You guys who are guessing at what behavior etc, and basing your advice etc, need to learn to read the modlog.
Probably my sentence structure was confusing.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You blocking me does not qualify as censorship due to individual liberties. I can agree that if someone is frequently complaining about trans people, even some people who agree will grow tired of the negativity. There is a problem trying to public promote a service as an established service and attract new users, and then to say "No, we don't allow your kind in here, you are only allowed to agree with every word we say", that starts to look like a bait and switch scam and pushing dictatorial censorship.
Do an internet search for "mastodon censorship" and read through 10 different search results.