"China is the future, do you agree?"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The PRC definitely has its problems, but I am especially encouraged by their massive restructuring of their energy grid. I don't think Communism will come by 2100, but maybe 2150 or 2200, as there are going to be Capitalist holdouts for a long time resisting progress.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You're free to elaborate on the humor of satarizing a Chinese man as a yellow cartoon bear. Calling me a "tankie" for thinking that maybe we shouldn't be using potentially racist caricatures doesn't make much sense to me personally.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As much as we might criticize the whole, "End of History" idea, I feel like the 90's was the last time Americans had anything like that kind of optimism. There was a feeling that we were entering a new age of international cooperation, and although I was only a child that was something I really believed in. But we soon found new conflicts to be embroiled in a the dream has died and was proven to be foolish and naive, and now everyone across the political spectrum is highly cynical.
I'm sure that there are many cynical people in China too, but I can hardly remember the last time I saw someone who wasn't cynical when it comes to politics. Whether or not it's naive, it hits me on an emotional level.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The good thing about China is that they have a lot of reason to be hopeful, due to many massive improvements in the last century, skyrocketing in the last decade. USians largely still envision 90s China, and are having that image shattered.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Earth first, fuck your countries.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I do not call you a tankie for that, as I also oppose racist caricatures. Instead, I call you a tankie because you seem to be defending Xi a little too much. Have a good evening.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You were giving sympathetic advice to someone defending the racist caricature you claim to oppose, so pardon me for interpreting it that way. As for "defending Xi a little too much," what does that constitute? Saying people shouldn't use racist caricatures against him?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don’t know, will you ever get tired of pushing US disinformation about Chinese local & federal government’s responses to the CIA-backed terrorist attacks in Xinjiang?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I mean china is an authoritarian state, that kinda thing never works for long
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What's a non-authoritarian state?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What do you call Tibet then. I know they couldn't fight back that much, but it's a literal invasion.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Tibet was recognised by every country on the planet as sovereign Chinese territory, both then and today.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In 1959, Anna Louise Strong visited an exhibition of torture equipment that had been used by the Tibetan overlords. There were handcuffs of all sizes, including small ones for children, and instruments for cutting off noses and ears, gouging out eyes, breaking off hands, and hamstringing legs. There were hot brands, whips, and special implements for disemboweling. The exhibition presented photographs and testimonies of victims who had been blinded or crippled or suffered amputations for thievery. There was the shepherd whose master owed him a reimbursement in yuan and wheat but refused to pay. So he took one of the master’s cows; for this he had his hands severed. Another herdsman, who opposed having his wife taken from him by his lord, had his hands broken off. There were pictures of Communist activists with noses and upper lips cut off, and a woman who wasremovedd and then had her nose sliced away.23
Earlier visitors to Tibet commented on the theocratic despotism. In 1895, an Englishman, Dr. A. L. Waddell, wrote that the populace was under the “intolerable tyranny of monks” and the devil superstitions they had fashioned to terrorize the people. In 1904 Perceval Landon described the Dalai Lama’s rule as “an engine of oppression.” At about that time, another English traveler, Captain W.F.T. O’Connor, observed that “the great landowners and the priests… exercise each in their own dominion a despotic power from which there is no appeal,”
Liberating people from inhumanly cruel and merciless theocratic overlords is good, actually.
Quotes from "Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth" by Micheal Parenti. The whole essay is quite good and not very long. https://forum.ableton.com/viewtopic.php?t=88773
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Putting aside everything else, approximately when do you believe that happened?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm saying this unironically: this comment could go on any dumbass thread about China's dumbass social media and dumbass AI. I don't understand why I don't see it more.
They. Are. Authoritarian.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
reply to the person who’s actually arguing with you, coward!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
babe all i know is folks in china who protest their own government use whinnie the pooh as a derogatory representation for that man. are THEY being racist? or is it possible that the color of the cartoon plush bear isn’t the point?
maybe it’s more to do with whinnie the pooh being a dopey idiot liable to get his head stuck in a honey jar. i reckon THAT’S the insult. it seems pretty obvious against something so literally stupid as “haha bc he’s yellow”.
i didn’t think people SERIOUSLY still used this garbage as a gotcha. you’ve genuinely impressed me with your willingness to so boldly plow into a bad faith argument. please do something better with your time
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Tanks stopping when a person blocked their path? And remaining calm even when the person climbs over the tank? Finally the tank driver talking with person calmly?
Their army or atleast the tank driver seems to be very decent.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The Tiger character is called TiggerTotally not racist?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The Tiger character is called TiggerTotally not racist?
Btw, what does Tigger rhyme with, my fellow Ningen?Censorship of memes is not fun as a person who likes memes, but considering how they lifted millions of their people out of poverty very quickly, a ban on a racist meme is ok.
^Copied from my comment to another person in this thread^