Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained OpenAI Data
-
tux0r@feddit.orgreplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
So that means that Microsoft will pay compensation to us, right?
-
transplantedsconie@lemm.eereplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
Chinese company:
Truly, you have a dizzling intellect.
Microsoft:
AND IM JUST GETTING STARTED! Where was I?
Chinese company:
Stealing data....
-
chowjeebai@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
When you can't beat em, sue em. It's the American way.
-
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.dereplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
How could it be better when they just stole everything? The fact that its better basically proves that its not stolen.
-
ubergeek@lemmy.todayreplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
Are they worried that deepsink too stuff written by others, mixed it up, and repackaged it as it's own?
Well, yeah, that's all AI is. An expensive weighted pachinko machine, that uses human made content, and remixes it.
-
no_ones_slick_like_gaston@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 27 days ago last edited by
Is it worth it? Let me work it
I put my thing down, flip it and reverse it -
chiliedogg@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
The question isn't whether they've used the same information. It's whether they've faked the process to achieve that 20x efficiency.
Look at it like a dictionary. Writing one from scratch is a huge task, no matter how many other books exist. How do you even go about finding all of the words?
But if other people have already worm dictionaries, you can just use their word lists and go from there.
It's more efficient, but only because it's a completely different task.
-
erasmus@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
If I stole from the thief, is it really stealing?
- some Philosopher probably
-
aeronmelon@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
“You can’t steal that public data! We stole it first!”
And considering that’s exactly what Microsoft did to Apple with point and click, what irony!
-
briantheebiscuiteer@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
"Waaaaah" you say?
-
synopsistantilize@lemm.eereplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
Oh really? **Rabbit hole unlocked
-
fartventriloquist69@sh.itjust.worksreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
They both stole point and click from Xerox if my memory serves me correctly
-
demizerone@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
Somebody better call the WAHMBULANCE!
-
brumefey@sh.itjust.worksreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
So the suggestion from @heavydust@sh.itjust.works will just increase their revenue
-
leftytighty@slrpnk.netreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
yeah xerox invented the GUI and mouse
-
icastfist@programming.devreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
In Brazil, there's a rhymed saying: "ladrão que rouba ladrão tem 100 anos de perdão", it translates to "a thief that steals from a thief has 100 years of forgiveness"
-
aeronmelon@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFcb-XF1RPQ
The relevant part of Pirates of Silicon Valley. After which you should watch the whole thing. It’s fan fiction, but it’s the best explanation of what happened between Apple and Microsoft leading into the 1990s.
-
shortstack@reddthat.comreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
What’s the game plan if they did?
Trade restrictions?
China already proved those did fuck all to stop them from developing their own model.
Ducking knew this ai bubble would burst sooner or later, just glad we can finally get on with it now.
-
jhex@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
What data? they one OpenAI illegally obtained first?!
-
rangerjosey@lemmy.mlreplied to Guest 26 days ago last edited by
Stealing from theives isn't a crime.
Especially not when China turns around and Robin Hoods it back to the world.
Just saying.
32/76