Russia Not on US Tariff List Despite Broad Global Reach | Sweden Herald
-
Trump is definitely a Russian asset.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byEmbracing the Ultra-Nationalist Paleocon wing of the Republican Party and stuffing your administration with goldbugs and Silicon Valley anarcho-capitalists?
Why does an American President consuming American Propaganda and regurgitating a uniquely American public policy at the behest of his wealthiest American peers and hooting white-nationalist proles waving American flags get flagged as Russian?
-
The US has been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the last decade. We aren't tariffing them because we aren't trading with them.
We also aren't tariffing Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea, for the same reasons.
wrote 10 days ago last edited bySurely American trades some products? Where does Russian vodka come from?
-
Surely American trades some products? Where does Russian vodka come from?
wrote 10 days ago last edited byhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/1306859/us-imports-by-commodity-from-russia/
It does look like we import about $3B/year. Mostly fertilizers, which make up 1/3 of total imports, and some raw metals and a bit of heavy machinery. But that's minuscule beside our trade balances with the top of his tariff list - China, the EU, Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan, and India. We do $20B/year with tiny little South Korea, as a point of comparison. We bring in $6B/year from South Africa.
To my knowledge, we don't import Russian vodka in any significant quantity. Anything "Russian" branded is typically imported from one of the neighboring states - Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Romania. Red Army Vodka, for instance, is from a Polish company.
-
Surely American trades some products? Where does Russian vodka come from?
wrote 10 days ago last edited byI was under the impression that we (in Canada) get our vodka mostly from Finland, but it's been a while since I worked as an alcohol purveyor... I'm ashamed of the things I did during those years, but I'm in recovery now, thank you for your concern
-
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1306859/us-imports-by-commodity-from-russia/
It does look like we import about $3B/year. Mostly fertilizers, which make up 1/3 of total imports, and some raw metals and a bit of heavy machinery. But that's minuscule beside our trade balances with the top of his tariff list - China, the EU, Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan, and India. We do $20B/year with tiny little South Korea, as a point of comparison. We bring in $6B/year from South Africa.
To my knowledge, we don't import Russian vodka in any significant quantity. Anything "Russian" branded is typically imported from one of the neighboring states - Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Romania. Red Army Vodka, for instance, is from a Polish company.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byHe slapped a 50% tarrif on Lesotho, so it's clearly not about size or impact.
And the UK got a 10% tariff applied even though the US doesn't have a goods trade deficit with them.
-
I’m honestly not sure how that would apply to infant adoptions. It’s my understanding that if the adoption occurs early enough, the adoptive parents will be listed on the birth certificate. It certainly feels like a child adopted in infancy by citizens should be just as eligible for the presidency as a child naturally born to citizens, but I’d also have a hard time drawing a line age-wise after which that would no longer apply and I do see a reason to bar children adopted at 17 from the presidency. My niece was adopted at three years old and she does remember her biological mother, but she’s absolutely my sister and brother in law’s daughter, in terms of her personality, culture, and values. That’s only a data point of one and I’d like more, but I don’t know how easy that would be to track for other adopted children.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byIf she has a US birth certificate she would be a citizen I believe. If not any attempt to run for office would be questioned.
-
https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/imports/united-states
Russia imports $17 billions from USA. So we don’t have a trade deficit with Russia.
He’s definitely a Russian troll, but I’m not sure this is the data point to prove it.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byThe US consistently runs a trade deficit with Russia.
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4621.html
The US has a trade surplus with the UK, but still applied a 10% tariff to them.
-
The US has been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the last decade. We aren't tariffing them because we aren't trading with them.
We also aren't tariffing Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea, for the same reasons.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byMaybe, but apparently we're tariffing multiple uninhabited islands. It would seem that active trade is not a perquisite for tariffs these days. can't be having people move out there and not getting tariffed in the future.
I hope he puts tariffs on Mars next. Maybe after he falls out with musk.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 10 days ago last edited by
You can view this one of two ways, possibly both:
- Krasnov
- Trump apparently was doing these tariffs based on trade deficits (Which is stupid on its own, if your dentist doesn't buy the widgets you sell, that's not a tariff.), if Russia wasn't running one, then there you go.
To rebuke 2 I present the following- https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia
U.S. total goods trade with Russia were an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024. U.S. goods exports to Russia in 2024 were $526.1 million, down 12.3 percent ($73.5 million) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from Russia totaled $3.0 billion in 2024, down 34.2 percent ($1.6 billion) from 2023. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a 37.5 percent decrease ($1.5 billion) over 2023.
Based on that math, with the CNN article I linked for the formula we get - (2,500,000,000 / 3,000,000,000) * 1/2 = 0.416666...
So Russia should have a 41% tariff.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 10 days ago last edited by
I wonder why...
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 10 days ago last edited by
For context, Cuba, North Korea, and Belarus are also not tariffed because they are sanctioned instead.
-
3 billion is nothing.
I wonder how much the EU imports.
wrote 10 days ago last edited by3 billion is nothing.
Cool, can I borrow $3 billion?
Trump put tariffs on uninhibited islands, which is literally $0 in trade.
-
Im going to need some serious evidence that the sitting US president is not a natural born citizen and therefore is not actually the president.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byWell, he could just show his birth certificate, right?
-
The US consistently runs a trade deficit with Russia.
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4621.html
The US has a trade surplus with the UK, but still applied a 10% tariff to them.
wrote 10 days ago last edited bySo is that trading economics website just BS, then?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 10 days ago last edited by
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
-
I wonder why...
wrote 10 days ago last edited byThat picture is one of the funniest I’ve ever seen. Absolutely a classic.
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byIt’s almost like they couldn’t get this from Canada anymore…for some reason…
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 10 days ago last edited bythe same is true for other countries on this list. nearly all of them for example
-
Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byThe real key resource that Russia holds has to be a video of Trump on Epsteins Island.
-
The US has been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the last decade. We aren't tariffing them because we aren't trading with them.
We also aren't tariffing Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea, for the same reasons.
wrote 10 days ago last edited byit's funny that this is being downvoted. lemmy is basically reddit. rooting for the good guys, but also dogshit stupid