Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.

Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
385 Posts 179 Posters 2.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • knightly@pawb.socialK [email protected]

    You're thinking of fascism. In America, the legislature names things, the executive signs or vetoes, and the judiciary adjudicates.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    You're thinking of fascism.

    I have some bad news for you.

    knightly@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      O This user is from outside of this forum
      O This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Funny thing - I just checked yandex maps (because I'm bored) and it still shows "gulf of mexico" on it.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I [email protected]

        You're thinking of fascism.

        I have some bad news for you.

        knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        I 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B [email protected]

          IIRC it only shows up that way for US users.

          apparently that was either a lie or incomplete info

          Where'd you first hear this?

          Not judging, just curious about the information chain.

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Reporting about how the maps team reclassified the US as a "sensitive country", a la: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/28/google-reclassifies-us-as-sensitive-country-like-china-russia-.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lupusblackfur@lemmy.worldL [email protected]

            If there existed any valid reasoning for the change... 🤷‍♂️
            But the Felon Dicktater is only doing it so he can claim himself architect of global geographic change. Same reason he wants Greenland, Panama, Gaza, etc.
            Fuck that.
            I back Sheinbaum on this one. Won't matter, but do it anyway.

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            He wants to seize Greenland, Panama and Canada because they are either strategically important or have valuable resources, or both. This name change though is just because he hates Mexicans.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • knightly@pawb.socialK [email protected]

              Oh, you've been caught being dumb and your story is changing.

              First it was "the government", now it's "the president".

              That's not how America works, lol. Naming things is a legislative responsibility. Trump can sign as many executive orders as he wants, but it isn't official without an act of congress and a chance for the judiciary to object.

              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              Yes, and Congress delegated that authority in 1947 via Public Law 242, creating the US Board on Geographic Names, under the Secretary of the Interior, part of the executive branch. The President has the authority to direct the Secretary.

              You can speak as confidently as you like, but you're still wrong. Feel free to learn: https://www.usgs.gov/us-board-on-geographic-names

              knightly@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • knightly@pawb.socialK [email protected]

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                Homie, I was never hiding it.

                knightly@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I [email protected]

                  Homie, I was never hiding it.

                  knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  You really weren't.

                  You should learn to hide your power level, lol~

                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    Less threatening... More doing.

                    The U.S. dictatorship are just doing and they're slowly tearing apart OUR planet.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L [email protected]

                      What else do people expect them to do?

                      1.- Refuse-

                      2.- Apply only the part of the name change that's actually covered by US jurisdiction. The Gulf of Mexico extends noticeably beyond US's borders.

                      But hey this is Google we're talking about.

                      Besides, it still say Gulf of Mexico if you’re outside the USA.

                      If I'm a eg.: Colombian, it should be "Gulf of Mexico" "Golfo de México" wherever I stand, not "Gulf of America".

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      Apply only the part of the name change that’s actually covered by US jurisdiction.

                      Strictly speaking, per the EO, this is what they should have done. The EO defines the area to be renamed as:

                      the U.S. Continental Shelf area bounded on the northeast, north, and northwest by the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and extending to the seaward boundary with Mexico and Cuba in the area formerly named as the Gulf of Mexico

                      You can see exactly where that seaward boundary is on this map: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_ECS_Regions_2023.png

                      The area described is less than half the whole Gulf of Mexico.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • knightly@pawb.socialK [email protected]

                        You really weren't.

                        You should learn to hide your power level, lol~

                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        I'm just the messenger, kid. I'm not even in the USA, I'm in a different hemisphere watching with popcorn.

                        Good luck over there 🫡

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C [email protected]

                          Yes, and Congress delegated that authority in 1947 via Public Law 242, creating the US Board on Geographic Names, under the Secretary of the Interior, part of the executive branch. The President has the authority to direct the Secretary.

                          You can speak as confidently as you like, but you're still wrong. Feel free to learn: https://www.usgs.gov/us-board-on-geographic-names

                          knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          knightly@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #52

                          Did you not read the page you linked?

                          That org was "established in its present form by Public Law in 1947 to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the Federal Government."

                          It's a standards-setting org that adjudicates between other agencies of the government when there is disagreement between them about a place name, it isn't entitled to rename things everyone was already in agreement about, lol~

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C [email protected]
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            I thought they just did that in the US

                            N 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I [email protected]

                              Because Google is a US company, and not in a position to tell the US government to take a walk, that's why.

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              I mean, they are to an extent. The laws of the US are ostensibly supposed to allow citizens to call things whatever they want. If the government wants to throw a hissy fit and say the constitution is meaningless after all, let them do it. At least then we could give up all of the pretense that they are supposed to care about what it says.

                              I 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                don@lemm.eeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                don@lemm.eeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                FUCK YEAH, DO IT DO IT FUCKING DO IT! Please sue the fuck outta those shitfucks!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S [email protected]

                                  I mean, they are to an extent. The laws of the US are ostensibly supposed to allow citizens to call things whatever they want. If the government wants to throw a hissy fit and say the constitution is meaningless after all, let them do it. At least then we could give up all of the pretense that they are supposed to care about what it says.

                                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  to allow citizens to call things whatever they want.

                                  I very much doubt that privilege extends to a mapmaker

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C [email protected]
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    Restrict Google from doing business.in the country altogether.

                                    Have phones switch to some open non Google platform

                                    Fuck google, microsoft, apple, they're all evil at this point

                                    K P 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C [email protected]
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      magnetosphere@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      magnetosphere@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #58

                                      Don’t “threaten”. Any asshole can make a threat. GO AHEAD AND DO IT.

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O [email protected]

                                        This is accurate. Here's a screenshot from my friend in France.

                                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        Ok, that's absurd. I thought it makes sense to change the name in the US if that's the official name in the US (according to the USGS data, which has always been the official source for this info). But translating the US name into other languages that already have a name for it makes no sense.

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • knightly@pawb.socialK [email protected]

                                          Did you not read the page you linked?

                                          That org was "established in its present form by Public Law in 1947 to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the Federal Government."

                                          It's a standards-setting org that adjudicates between other agencies of the government when there is disagreement between them about a place name, it isn't entitled to rename things everyone was already in agreement about, lol~

                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          Yes, it sets the official name of each place. That's what everyone here is talking about.

                                          knightly@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups