As top Trump aides sent texts on Signal, flight data show a member of the group chat was in Russia
-
These fucking fools, these incompetent baboons. Gods damn the whole lot of 'em.
Goons. Absolute apes
-
Rooted phones with signal are more secure or less secure?
Less. If someone has root privs on your phone they can screenshot without your notice and send those shots wherever they want, encryption or self-deleting messaging apps be damned.
-
Lol I wear my ban with pride. All you have to do is go over there and use the word 'tankie'. They really don't like that word for some reason.
next step is get banned from progressive politics
a ml proxy hidden in plain sight
-
Only once, before the immunity kicks in
It might happen twice, but that's the max, I'm pretty sure.
-
The Guy's name is putin.
Krasnov’s Daddy
-
Hang them all
-
I find you in every thread shitting on ml at the vaguest mention of Russia or China though. Before anyone ever brought up anything related to them. It's almost like you have an agenda. Or vendetta.
Please show me on this doll where the dirty commies hurt you:
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠉⢹⣿⣏⠉⣹⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀
⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀
⠠⠿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⠟⠋⣀⡈⠛⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⠿⠇⠀
⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⡀
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠏⠀⠈⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡁⠀⣰⣿⣦⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠘⠻⠛⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀
⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣶⣤⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀
⠀⠈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀Russia is communist? You might want to update your maps.
-
That's treason.
-
They try to play themselves off as communists but I can't say I've ever seen a single one of them make a legitimate comment about communist ideals. What they really are is a propaganda mouthpiece for the Chinese and Russian governments.
Historically, groups that have "communist" in their name have been Soviet mouthpieces. Not all of them, and the ideology doesn't require it by any means, but it happened a lot. Conversely, if they had "socialist" in their name, they were more likely to want nothing to do with that shit.
-
Important reminder. Why is this downvoted?
Because it's largely irrelevant? If someone says "This is the best lock you can use on your front door" and someone else replies "not if you leave the key in the lock" do you think that's a important thing to mention? No lock is safe if you leave the key in the lock. Maybe it's important to remind people that you shouldn't leave your key in the lock, but that statement says nothing about the security of the lock.
Similarly maybe it's important to remind people that their phones might already be rooted, but that statement says nothing about whether Signal is good or bad from a security point of view.
-
Hang them all
The French Revolution can't come back soon enough
-
Why monitor what he went there to inform them about?
Who's to say this member in Russia doesn't live there...
-
Who thinks Putin doesn't intercept these chats?
-
Who thinks Putin doesn't intercept these chats?
Who thinks he needs to intercept them?
He was probably told before any of these guys.
-
I'm sure that everyone, including trump will feel the full force of the law. The FBI will immediately investigate make arrest and punish everyone involved in this blatant act of anti-patriotism and treason.
Right?
-
The French Revolution can't come back soon enough
Might want to read up on what happened after all that... Because... yeah.
-
That's treason.
Oh they know. We know.
-
Looks like Russia won the ideological war and will be exporting authoritarianism to the globe.
will be?
They already have — quite successfully.
-
Goons. Absolute apes
An insult to apes.
-
As far as I'm aware the encryption can't really be broken given the current amount of compute. Is anyone aware of what potential vulnerabilities there could be to the Signal protocol outside of brute forcing? How hard is it to crack a private public key exchange?
One of the biggest issues is they can be recorded and potentially decrypted in the future once quantum computing attacks become feasible. At the moment, the cryptography in Signal (or similar) has no known vulnerabilities that would make it vulnerable to practical attacks given reasonable assumptions about the technology that exists in the world at the moment.
