OpenAI Says DeepSeek Used Its Work Without Permission
-
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.worksreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Can you rephrase this into something legible?
-
z3k3@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
What's the opposite of eating the onion? I thought it was satire ehen i 1st saw this story
-
archrecord@lemm.eereplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Corporations are allowed to steal, just not from each other, that's bad. /s
-
badland9085@lemm.eereplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Says the company that literally crawled the Internet without anyone’s permission to train their damn model.
Rules for thee, not for me.
-
sharkfucker420@lemmy.mlreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Tragic really
-
naiboftabr@infosec.pubreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
of the wealthy, by the wealthy, for the wealthy
-
ashman85@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Open AI used OUR work with out permission
-
naiboftabr@infosec.pubreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Well well, how the turn tables.
-
vipsu@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
"And there’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled the knowledge out of OpenAI models, and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this," Sacks explained.
What makes this even funnier is that A.I generated content isn't even copyrightable.
-
computerchairgeneral@fedia.ioreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
"You're trying to kidnap what I've rightfully stolen!" -OpenAI 2025.
-
jontree255@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
-
vodkasolution@feddit.itreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Oh, gee, a good news for today!
-
tonytins@pawb.socialreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Someone I saw on YouTube asked, "How can you steal from someone named 'OpenAI'?"
-
tourist@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
From my experience and expertise, Ambien. Man's gonna get a knock on the door from the walrus any second now.
-
lowleveldata@programming.devreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
it's ok ChatGPT you can join us the unemployed
-
chowjeebai@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
It's true! Ai will take our jobs! Hahahaha
-
shadowedcross@sh.itjust.worksreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
There exists not, a violin small enough for this occasion.
-
fluxion@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Meanwhile OpenAI no doubt frantically copying the shit out of Deepseek right now
-
dadifer@lemmy.worldreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
Do you want to go back to where I found you!? Unemployed!? In Greenland?!
-
imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.worksreplied to Guest 23 days ago last edited by
The user is asking for me to rephrase a difficult to parse line of text.
I think the poster was talking about my code being open source and free and therefore my coders and country not being interested in generating profit.
But wait, perhaps the user was just having a stroke. Perhaps this posting was a cry for help and the icey cold world of Lemmy just down-voted the user instead of coming to his aide
But wait, that's unlikely. The user was probably drunk and just has fat fingers likely covered in powdered cheese which can cause data entry errors on touch screen devices.
I should also consider that the user is a non-English speaker and ran their comment through a translator application that butchered their intent. But wait, the punctuation does not look like something a translation app would generate without poor data input.
I think ultimately I should be careful not to offend anyone, but the most likely explanation is that this was someone with limited experience with written English and some degree of intoxication. The meaning is vague and the comment is best left ignored.
21/130