Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Asklemmy
  3. Are we modern humans, across the board, enormous wussies compared to people, say, 150+ years ago?

Are we modern humans, across the board, enormous wussies compared to people, say, 150+ years ago?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Asklemmy
30 Posts 28 Posters 146 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G [email protected]

    Strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create bad times, bad times create strong men.

    anarchobolshevik@lemmygrad.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
    anarchobolshevik@lemmygrad.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K [email protected]

      Considering things like modern medicine not being available, infant and child mortality, the gruesome nature of most work back then... would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

      What can we infer from people's mindsets and resilience back then vs now, and do you think we're on the verge of a return to these conditions?

      I think techno-feudalism has the capacity to be much more brutal than any old time machiavellan clown. The way our minds are deliberately manipulated by algorithms nowadays are much more subtle and insidious than anything the tyrants of yesteryear could've dreamt up, while at the same time convincing people they have it better than ever.

      loopy@lemm.eeL This user is from outside of this forum
      loopy@lemm.eeL This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      That's an interesting question. Many people are answering the question "Would people from 150 years ago think the quality of life is better" instead of "Would they think modern people are weaker."

      I think that depends on how you define "weak" or "strong." Physically, I think there is less manual labor needed, so in general people from the past may look at us as weaker. The understanding of mental health and resilience is lesser in the past, but if conveyed in relative terms, I do think they would see how more resilient we need to generally be to things now like doom scrolling and algorithms that we are exposed to in the present.

      Humans are pretty adaptable. Since we generally have more access to resources now, I would argue modernity has the side effect of hindering our sense of agency. Likewise, we are adapting different "strengths" based on the challenges we get in the present.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K [email protected]

        Considering things like modern medicine not being available, infant and child mortality, the gruesome nature of most work back then... would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

        What can we infer from people's mindsets and resilience back then vs now, and do you think we're on the verge of a return to these conditions?

        I think techno-feudalism has the capacity to be much more brutal than any old time machiavellan clown. The way our minds are deliberately manipulated by algorithms nowadays are much more subtle and insidious than anything the tyrants of yesteryear could've dreamt up, while at the same time convincing people they have it better than ever.

        K This user is from outside of this forum
        K This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Thanks for your answer! I was afraid I had posed the question wrong somehow but this is exactly what I was getting at.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K [email protected]

          Considering things like modern medicine not being available, infant and child mortality, the gruesome nature of most work back then... would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

          What can we infer from people's mindsets and resilience back then vs now, and do you think we're on the verge of a return to these conditions?

          I think techno-feudalism has the capacity to be much more brutal than any old time machiavellan clown. The way our minds are deliberately manipulated by algorithms nowadays are much more subtle and insidious than anything the tyrants of yesteryear could've dreamt up, while at the same time convincing people they have it better than ever.

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Yes they would think we were softies.

          I even see it just in my families immediate generations. My grandfather rode his bike everywhere, and never owned a car. He was fit. He got hit by a car once and waited at the hospital, after a few hours he said screw it, and cycled home.

          For me growing up most families had one car, which the working parent drove, so if you needed to get to a friends house or anywhere it was by foot or by bike if it was outside of town. Or waiting several hours at a place for a ride. Being further from home meant you had to sometimes get creative for food. Friend and I once sharpened sticks and spearfished and cooked lunch over a dried stick fire rather than walk all the way back home.

          My adult kids are hardworking individuals but they grew up with more modern convenience of 2 cars, uber, functioning bus system, food delivery. If their car or phone app broke, I think they would find walking or biking somewhere a deterrent to following through, especially if it was raining.

          And there is the teen generation who you hear instantly complain "oh my gawd, my uber is like 1 minute late, like I have been standing here sooo long" LOL
          And a parent suggesting they walk leads to "oh my gawduh, then I will be all sweaty!"

          That teen is never spearfishing because the walk home is too far. If their phone dies (along with payment app) they will probably have a breakdown/ feel stranded. My grandfather would never be able to fathom somebody being so unreliant onthemselves let along Somebody from 150 years ago seeing an able bodied teen not be able to use their legs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lesbiansmademegay@lemmy.blahaj.zoneL [email protected]

            Literal fascist rhetoric

            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            You may be confusing actual strong men, the men who made the new deal, the greatest generation who fought world wars and survived the great depression with fake man baby toddler "strong men" such as putin, jong il, erdogan, musk, and shitler. I stand by the strong men of the greatest generation created good times which led to this generation of neo-fascist man babies. Real men dont perform masculinity.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G [email protected]

              Strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create bad times, bad times create strong men.

              buboscandiacus@mander.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
              buboscandiacus@mander.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              And soft men make you hard

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU [email protected]

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Ah, but you see people in the 1920’s had to fight for their immune defense to polio. People in the 2020’s were handed theirs on a silver syringe and are, therefore, wussies

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K [email protected]

                  Considering things like modern medicine not being available, infant and child mortality, the gruesome nature of most work back then... would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

                  What can we infer from people's mindsets and resilience back then vs now, and do you think we're on the verge of a return to these conditions?

                  I think techno-feudalism has the capacity to be much more brutal than any old time machiavellan clown. The way our minds are deliberately manipulated by algorithms nowadays are much more subtle and insidious than anything the tyrants of yesteryear could've dreamt up, while at the same time convincing people they have it better than ever.

                  blujay320@lemmy.blahaj.zoneB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blujay320@lemmy.blahaj.zoneB This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Quality of life is definitely exponentially better than it was at that time. However, while we may not face the same physical turmoils, I believe the mental turmoil is much, much greater in the modern day. We do not have nearly as much concern for physical health, but mental health has hit the floor. I don’t know that the general human condition is necessarily “better” or “worse”, just different

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K [email protected]

                    Considering things like modern medicine not being available, infant and child mortality, the gruesome nature of most work back then... would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

                    What can we infer from people's mindsets and resilience back then vs now, and do you think we're on the verge of a return to these conditions?

                    I think techno-feudalism has the capacity to be much more brutal than any old time machiavellan clown. The way our minds are deliberately manipulated by algorithms nowadays are much more subtle and insidious than anything the tyrants of yesteryear could've dreamt up, while at the same time convincing people they have it better than ever.

                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Here's a half hour video on how industrial work differed from agricultural work

                    https://youtu.be/hvk_XylEmLo

                    There are some cases where stresses back then were worse than today, but there are a lot of cases where today is worse from the point of view of certain stresses.

                    You also have differences in expectations. For instance, it was common for children to die due to different reasons. That vastly changes the parent-child dynamic.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vanth@reddthat.comV [email protected]

                      would a "standard" commoner from back then laugh at how 'soft' our world has become from their point of view?

                      No, they'd either want the same or they'd think we're evil magicians and want to burn us at the stake. Who tf wants more infant mortality (except for US Republicans and their ilk).

                      "Ah yes, dying in childbirth really builds character!"

                      "Contracting polio really put hair on my son's chest and made him into the man he is today!"

                      "I'm so glad I can look forward to a life of hard physical labor and and death at 40. Not like those future weaklings who might survive into their 70s and beyond."

                      "Oh, boy. Chattel slavery has been great for us. The family that picks cotton together, sticks together ... until our owners decide to sell us off."

                      krik@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                      krik@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      The people back then lived to 60-70 years. The average life expectancy was 30-40 years because of the extremely high child mortality. Almost like half the children died before they became 10 years old. Most of them died within their first year when the body and immune system are still very weak.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • System shared this topic on
                        System shared this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups